Pedagogical reflection and the ways of its development among the students of pedagogical professions
Abstract
This article is dedicated to the development of pedagogical reflection among students of professions related to teaching. Based on the works of S.Yu. Stepanov, I.N. Semenov, A.A. Bodalev, Yu.M. Orlov, N.I. Gutkin and other Russian researchers. The authors of the article clarified the types of pedagogical reflection, the corresponding skills and the related types of learning tasks that can be used in the training of future teachers. The article also presents the complex of authors of pedagogical conditions that guarantee the development of pedagogical reflection among students. The complex includes the following components: the creation of a favorable emotional environment during the lessons with the students; the use of the didactic technique system designed to take students to a reflective position; the application of reflective pedagogical technologies in the educational process of the university, promoting the development of pedagogical reflection among future teachers and improving the quality of their education. The article also describes the results of the experimental work, which confirmed the effectiveness of the developed complex of conditions that guarantee the development of reflection among students of pedagogical professions.
Downloads
References
Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and teacher education, 11(1), 33-49.
Ilyasov, I. I., & Bergman, A. G. (1964). TROINYE VZAIMNYE SISTEMY GALOGENIDOV TSEZIYA, NATRIYA, KALIYA I KADMIYA.
ZHURNAL NEORGANICHESKOI KHIMII, 9(6), 1416-1422.
Kan-Kalik, V. A. (1987). Uchitelyu o pedagogicheskom obshchenii. M.: Prosveshcheniye.
Karpov, A. V. (2004). The psychology of activity reflexive mechanisms. - M.: PH “Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences”, 257. [in Russian].
Klarin, M. V. (1994). The innovative models of training in foreign pedagogical searches. М: Pedagogica, 231.
Korthagen, F. A., & Kessels, J. P. (1999). Linking theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational researcher, 28(4), 4-17.
Ladenko, I. S. (1989). Reflection in science and education. - Novosibirsk: IFPSO, 254. [in Russian].
Lerner, I. Y. (1981). Didakticheskie osnovy metodov obuchenija. M. Pedagogika, 186.
Mamardashvili, M. K. (1996). The necessity of oneself. 256. [in Russian].
Nikandrov, N. D. (1995). Russian education after perestroika: the search for new values. International Review of Education, 41(1-2), 47- 57.
Ogurtsov, A. P. (1988). Disciplinary structure of science. Genesis and Argumentation. M.
Polyakova, O. O., & Lushkina, M. P. (2011). The features of the professional identity of modern students. MSU Bulletin, 2, 69-73. [in Russian].
Sarantsev, G. I. (2016). The harmonization of bachelor professional training in the field of “Pedagogical education”. Integration of education, 2, 211-219. [in Russian].
Schedrovitsky, G. P. (1982). The Mozart of psychology: An imaginary exchange of views. One is not born a personality, 59, 63.
Stepanov, S. Y., & Pokhmelkina, G. F. (1991). Reflexive psychology principles of pedagogical creativity. Questions of psychology, 5, 35-38.
Zagvyazinsky, V. I. (1987). Pedagogical creativity of the teacher. М.: Pedagogics, 160.
.gif)
