Parameters of modeling the semantic compatibility of educational information

Vladimir Pavlovich Klochkov; Galina Raisovna Rybakova; Natalya Olegovna Vasileva; Tatiana Viktorovna Malkova; Irina Vladimirovna Krotova

Vladimir Pavlovich Klochkov Psychology and Management Department, Chelyabinsk State University, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8859-2829
Galina Raisovna Rybakova Siberian Federal University, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4591-635X
Natalya Olegovna Vasileva Department of the Organization and Economics of Agricultural Production, Krasnoyarsk State Agrarian University, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9390-8576
Tatiana Viktorovna Malkova https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3263-7885
Irina Vladimirovna Krotova Siberian Federal University, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3185-9454

Keywords: Semantic compatibility of educational information; parameters of educational information compatibility; modeling; dichotomy; systematic approach; thesaurus measure of an educational text.

Abstract

This study explored the process of selecting parameters, which precedes the development of a computer model for analyzing educational texts in terms of the semantic compatibility of the information embedded in them. To analyze the selected set of dichotomies, one should solve several specific applied problems using the methods of mathematical modeling. One of these tasks is the creation of automated tools for identifying some compatibility aspects of information in educational texts. The authors used the dichotomous version of the system approach to identify the pairs of opposites in the concept of “educational information,” with subsequent content analysis and interpretation of the characteristics of this multidimensional and complex object. The identified dichotomies were used for substantiating a set of parameters according to the compatibility of educational information entered into computer programs for the analysis and processing of educational texts. The aim was improving the perception and acquisition of scientific knowledge mastered by students. The selected parameters demonstrate the role of the thesaurus and its distribution in the material and consider the unconscious component of the psyche. By analyzing structural characteristics represented in a system of signs, it is possible to use the considered set of indicators for assessing the compatibility of the semantic content of the texts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Vladimir Pavlovich Klochkov, Psychology and Management Department, Chelyabinsk State University, Russian Federation

Vice-President of the International Academy of Main Education, Doctor of Pedagogy, Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Doctor of Psychology (PsyD), Doctor of Business Administration (DBA), Professor of Psychology and Management Department, Chelyabinsk State University, Russian Federation

Galina Raisovna Rybakova, Siberian Federal University, Russian Federation

Candidate of Biological Sciences, Associate Professor of Commodity Science and Examination of Goods, Siberian Federal University, Russian Federation

Natalya Olegovna Vasileva, Department of the Organization and Economics of Agricultural Production, Krasnoyarsk State Agrarian University, Russian Federation

PhD in Technical Sciences, Associate Professor at the Department of the Organization and Economics of Agricultural Production, Krasnoyarsk State Agrarian University, Russian Federation

Tatiana Viktorovna Malkova

Candidate of Historical Sciences, Director of Miass Branch of Chelyabinsk State University, Russian Federation

Irina Vladimirovna Krotova, Siberian Federal University, Russian Federation

Doctor of Pedagogy, Professor of Commodity Science and Examination of Goods, Siberian Federal University, Russian Federation

References

Ananishnev, V.M. (2010). Modelling in the field of education. System Psychology and Sociology, 2, pp. 67-85.

Apresyan, Yu.D. (1995). Lexical semantics (synonymous means of language). In Selected Works, I. Moscow: Vostochnaya Literatura, RAS.

Barakhsanova, E.A. Nikiforov, I.I. (2018). Development of information competence of future teachers in a digital educational environment. Problems of Modern Teacher Training, 61(2), pp. 61-64.

Barakhsanova, E.A., Prokopyev, M.S., Nikolaeva, A.D., Panina, S.V., Vlasova, E.Z., Golikov, A.I. (2017). International integration movement in quality management of Russian education. Sociacion de Profesionales y Tecnicos del CONICIT, 38, pp. 55.

Dakhin, A.N. (2012) Pedagogical modeling: essence, efficiency and ... uncertainty. Issues of Internet Education, 6, pp. 22-26.

Delimova, Yu.O. (2013). Modeling in pedagogy and didactics. Bulletin of Shadrinsk State Pedagogical Institute, 3(19), pp. 33-38.

Hammond, D. (2003). The Science of Synthesis. Colorado: Univ. press of Colorado.

Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. London.

Kamoza, T.L. Klochkov, V.P., Glotova, M.V. (2005). Compatibility of topological connections in educational texts. Scientific Notes, 3, pp. 50-59.

Karaulov, Yu.N. (1981). Linguistic construction and thesaurus of a literary language. Moscow: Nauka Publishing House.

Klochkov, V P. (2003). The Unconscious: A Search for Conceptual Foundations. Krasnoyarsk: Tverdynya.

Klochkov, V P., Krotova, I.V., Malkova, T.V. (2018). Dichotomous aspects of natural science knowledge (based on scientific and educational texts): Monograph. Chelyabinsk: Chelyabinsk State University.

Klochkov, V.P. (1999). Optimization of Text Compatibility for a Basic Set of University Textbooks: Dissertation of a Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences 13.00.01 – General Pedagogy, History of Pedagogy and Education. Tomsk.

Klochkov, V.P. Vasilieva, N.O. (2011). Program-targeted analysis of text compatibility of textbooks for economics university majors (Dichotomous aspect). Omsk: “Ekonomicheskoye obrazovaniye” Publishing House.

Klochkov, V.P., Barakhsanova, E.A., Krotova, I.V., Rybakova, G.R., Malkova, T.V. (2019). Indicadores dicotómicos del modelado de compatibilidad de información educativa. Revista Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores: Edición Especial, VI. México, 11.

Klochkov, V.P., Petrova, A.T. (2005). Methodical Aspects of Management of Life Quality of Population. Krasnoyarsk: Siberian Federal University.

Klochkov, V.P., Rybakova, G.R. (2012). Methodology and methods of modeling the compatibility of educational information. Krasnoyarsk: PC Policorm.

Klochkov, V.P., Zaitsev, A.V. (2013). Scientific background for the emergence of an interdisciplinary dichotomous approach. Theory and Practice of Social Development, 8, pp. 353-356.

Klochkov, V.P., Zaitsev, А.V. (2013a). Analyse der Steuerung der regionalen Forst-und Holzwirtschaft. Saarbrucken, Deutschland: AV Akademikeverlag GmbH & Co. KG.

Kobozeva, I.M. (2004). Linguistic Semantics. Moscow: Editorial URSS.

Kudzh, S.A., Tsvetkov, V.Ya. (2018) Factors of cognitive complexity. Information Technologies in Science, Education and Management (ITNOU), 6, pp. 34-41.

Levin, K. (1980). Definition of the concept of “the field at the moment”. In A Reading Book on the History of Psychology: A Period of Open Crisis: the Early 10s–Mid 30s of the 20th Century. Moscow: Moscow University.

Lodatko, EA. (2010). Modeling of Pedagogical Systems and Processes: Monograph. Slavyansk: Chuvash Regional Branch of the Academy of Informatization of Education.

Logvinov, I.I. (1980). Simulation of Curricula. Moscow: Pedagogika.

Mandelbort, B. (1976). An informational theory of statistical structure of language. Communication Theory, 4, pp. 486-502.

Mayer, R.V. (2018). Understanding textual information: Computer modeling. Distance and Online Learning, 1(121), pp. 40-46.

Mikhalyov, A.B. (1995). Theory of the phonosemantic field. Pyatigorsk: Pyatigorsk State Linguistic University.

Morgunov, I.B. (2007). Optimization of some ordering problems (on the example of ordering educational material). Moscow: Research Center for the Problems of Specialists Training Quality.

Moskovich, V.A. (1969). Statistics and Semantics (Practice of Statistical Analysis of the Semantic Field). Moscow: Nauka.

Ohmae, K. (2005). The Next Global Stage: Challenges and Opportunities in our borderless world. New Jersey: Pearson Education.

Posner, M.I., McLeod, P. (1982). Information processing models – in search of elementary operations. Annu. Revue Psychology, 33, pp. 477-514.

Rybakova, G.R. (2017). Computer model of information compatibility “LingFreq“. Certificate on state registration of a computer program No. 2017662370, November 7, 2017.

Rybakova, G.R., Krotova, I.V., Kamoza, T.L. (2015). Modeling of educational information compatibility: methodological approaches. Humanitarian Vector, 1(41), pp. 24-34.

Sagatovsky, V.N. (1973). Fundamentals of the Systematization of Universal Categories. Tomsk: TMI Publishing House.

Shannon, K. (1963). The mathematical theory of communication. In Works on the Theory of Information and Cybernetics. Moscow, Foreign Literature Publishing House.

Shmelev, D.N. (1973). Problems of Semantic Analysis of Vocabulary. Moscow: Nauka.

Sonesson, G. (2003). Three scenarios for globalization. A view from cultural semiotics. Logic, dialogic, ideological. I segni tra funzionalita ed eccedenza. Milano.

Tsyganov, A.V. (2010). Innovative approaches in the educational process modeling. Bulletin of the Russian State Pedagogical University, 136, pp. 136-143.

Ugrinovich, N. (2017). Informatics and Information Technology. Moscow: BINOM.

Uvarov, M. (1996). Binary Archetype. The Evolution of the Idea of Antinomism in the History of European Philosophy and Culture. St. Petersburg: BSTU Publishing House.

Vasilieva, N.O., Krotova, I.V. (2014). Optimization of educational information compatibility. System-parametric version. Saarbrucken: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.

Zakharova, O.A. et al. (2010). Methodological Foundations of the Application of Information and Communication Technologies for the Development of Intellectual Characteristics of Students. Rostov-on-Don: DSTU Publishing Center.