Variability of phraseological units embodying the «blame» concept in national linguistic cultures

  • Tatiana Yu. Zalavina Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk, Russia
  • Lyudmila I. Antropova Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk, Russia
  • Nataliya V. Dyorina Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk, Russia
  • Liliya S. Polyakova Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk, Russia
  • Yuliya V. Yuzhakova Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk, Russia
Keywords: Blame, concept, lexico-grammatical variations, phraseological variants, verbal phraseological units.

Abstract

The study presents a conceptual analysis of the phraseological variation that arose as a result of reflecting the mental activity of people and the world language picture. It is vividly expressed in the phraseology of the language, which determines the state of the language and the conditions for its variability, which depend on the worldview and the cultural values of the speakers of national languages. The cognitive-linguistic study of phraseological corpus allows studying the variability of the French verbal phraseological units which represents the concept of blame as the component of the ethnic worldview. The concept of blame is a certain type of phraseological concept. It consists of verbal phraseological units of the French language. The verbal phraseological units which are the representatives of the given concept are included in the category of concept scenarios, as they objectify the semes of action, motion, and process. The aim of the study is via the example of the French verbal phraseological units-representatives of the concept of blame to demonstrate the ability of lexical and grammatical variation within a single language system, while maintaining the identity of their phraseological variants, and to prove the dynamics of the units at lexical and phraseological levels in synchronous level. This proves the novelty of the research, which results in the possibility of the existence of various phraseological features of the studied concept. They are a unified image, the same source of origin, a general denotative meaning, a partial or a complete coincidence of the structural meanings of the verbal lexical units when their grammatical structure does not coincide and vice versa. The variants of verbal phraseological units representatives of the concept of blame are being revealed. They are structured-grammatical, lexical-stylistic, lexical, and quantitative variants.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Tatiana Yu. Zalavina, Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk, Russia

Assistant professor of the Foreign Languages for Engineering Department, Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk, Russia

Lyudmila I. Antropova, Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk, Russia

Professor of the Foreign Languages for Engineering Department, Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk, Russia

Nataliya V. Dyorina, Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk, Russia

Assistant professor of the Foreign Languages for Engineering Department, Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk, Russia

Liliya S. Polyakova, Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk, Russia

Assistant professor of the Foreign Languages for Engineering Department, Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk, Russia

Yuliya V. Yuzhakova, Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk, Russia

Assistant professor of the Foreign Languages for Engineering Department, Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk, Russia

References

Alefirenko, N. (2006). Connotation and pragmatics of the "language of cultures". Slavic languages concerning culture, 8-26.

Antropova, L., Grigorieva, N, Zalavina T., Savinov D., Suvorova E., et al. (2014).

Imagery and rethinking as a form of semantic transformation of verbal phraseological units. Modern educational technologies in vocational training of students of the Technical University, 12- 14.

Antropova, L., Zalavina, T., & Polyakova, L. (2017). Linguistic and cultural space of Serbia and Russia: general and characteristic national and cultural Aspects. Naslede. Journal of Language, Literature, Arts, and Culture, 33-38.

Dyorina, N., Savinova, T., Zalavina, T., Zerkina, N., Kisel, O., et al. (2017). Polydiscursive Space: the Word, the Text, the Communication. Magnitogorsk. NMSTU.

Guiraud, P. (1969). La sйmantique. «Que sais-je?». Paris: Presses univercitaires de France.

Lineva, A., & Zalavina, T. (2013). The inner form of phraseological units and the Linguistic picture of the world. Actual problems of modern science, technology, and education, 132- 134.

Nazaryan, A. (1987). The phraseology of the Modern French Language. Moscow: High school.

Petit Larousse Illustre (1989). Dictionnaire de la langue franзaise. Paris: Librairie Larousse.

Retsker, J. (1963). French-Russian Phraseological Dictionary. Moscow: State Publishing House of Foreign National Dictionaries.

Rey, A. (2003). Dictionnaire des expressions et locutions. Paris: Le Robert.
Suvorova, E.V., Polyakova, L.S. (2018). Types of inferences in discourse. Arab World English Journal, 9 (1), 294-306.

Shansky, N. (2012). The phraseology of the Modern Russian Language. Moscow: Librocom.

Sokolova, G. (1998). Variabilitéphrasélogique comme moyen d’enrichissement du françаis actuel. Actes du XXII-èe Congrè International de linguistique et philology romanes, 479- 482. (in French)

Syreischikova, A. (1948). Locutions idiomatiques d` aprиs le principe etimologique. Moscow: Publishing House of Literature in Foreign Languages. (in French)

Telia, V. (1972). Idiom variation and the principles of variant identification. Problems of stability and variation of phraseological units, 30-69.

Yarovaya, V. (2002). Linguistics. The Great Encyclopedic Dictionary. Moscow: The Great Russian Encyclopedia.

Yuzhakova, Yu., & Polyakova, L. (2018). Ethnic stereotypes in English political discourse. Philological Science. Questions of theory and practice, 199-202.

Yuzhakova, Yu., Polyakova, L., Dyorina N., Zalavina, T. (2018). Peculiarities of ethnic stereotypes usage in English political discourse. Arab World English Journal, 9 (4), 464 - 472.

Zalavina, T., Afanasyeva, O., & Shorokhova, L. (2016). The paremiological concept of "money" as a form of mental representation of knowledge about the world. Problems of History, Philology, Culture, 372-379.

Zalavina, T. (2007). Cognitive-pragmatic aspects of phraseological units with the meaning "blame", 1-25.

Zalavina, T., & Kisel, O. (2016). "Blame” concept in phraseology: cognitive semantic Aspect (based on the French language)". International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 9693-9703.

Zhukov, V. (1986). Russian Phraseology. Moscow: High school.
Published
2019-10-11
How to Cite
Zalavina, T., Antropova, L., Dyorina, N., Polyakova, L., & Yuzhakova, Y. (2019). Variability of phraseological units embodying the «blame» concept in national linguistic cultures. Amazonia Investiga, 8(23), 132-139. Retrieved from https://www.amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/798
Section
Articles
Bookmark and Share