Hypotaxis in inflectional and agglutinative languages

Marzhan U. Suleybanova; Zufira H. Kieva; Marifa M. Sultygova; Uzlipat U. Gasanova; Marziyat M. Bidanok

Marzhan U. Suleybanova Russian language department of Chechen State University, Grozny
Zufira H. Kieva Ingush State University, Magas, Ingush Scientific-Research Institute of Humanities named after C. E. Akhriev, Magas
Marifa M. Sultygova Ingush State University, Magas
Uzlipat U. Gasanova Department of Humanitarian and Social and Economic Disciplines, All-Russian State University of Justice, Makhachkala
Marziyat M. Bidanok Adyghe Republican Institute for Humanitarian Studies named after I.M. Kerashev

Keywords: Hypotaxis, Indo-European languages, Iberian-Caucasian languages, Türkic languages, communications, development of a complex subordinate sentence “from the inside”.

Abstract

Linguists engaged in the study of syntax often pay attention to the problem of language and speech, words and simple sentences, phrases, but do not study the principles of identifying subordinate sentences. In the academic Russian Grammar, complex sentences are characterized as complex sentences, "including two simple sentences, of which one is syntactically subordinate to the other and is connected with the subordinate sentence by means of union or relative union word". The development of a complex sentence “from within a simple sentence through turns” is considered natural for the Iberian-Caucasian languages. According to the materials studied, there is no such provision in any Indo-European language. The non-person-verb motions were supplanted, replaced by subordinate verbs with the personal verb in the predicate, and not turned into them. In most Türkic languages, the question of hypotaxis is not finally resolved, as in the mountain Iberian-Caucasian languages. Some linguists believe that the predicative participial and adverbial circulations are expanded members of the sentence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Marzhan U. Suleybanova, Russian language department of Chechen State University, Grozny

Doctor of Philology, professor of the Russian language department of Chechen State University, Grozny

Zufira H. Kieva, Ingush State University, Magas, Ingush Scientific-Research Institute of Humanities named after C. E. Akhriev, Magas

Doctor of Philology, Ingush State University, Magas, Ingush Scientific-Research Institute of Humanities named after C. E. Akhriev, Magas

Marifa M. Sultygova, Ingush State University, Magas

Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Ingush State University, Magas

Uzlipat U. Gasanova, Department of Humanitarian and Social and Economic Disciplines, All-Russian State University of Justice, Makhachkala

Doctor of Philology, Professor of the Department of Dagestan Languages of the DSU and the Department of Humanitarian and Social and Economic Disciplines, All-Russian State University of Justice, Makhachkala

Marziyat M. Bidanok, Adyghe Republican Institute for Humanitarian Studies named after I.M. Kerashev

Doctor of Philosophy, The Adyghe Republican Institute for Humanitarian Studies named after I.M. Kerashev, Deputy Director for Science

References

Abitov M.L. (1963). The problem of complex sentence in the Kabardino-Circassian language, Questions descriptive grammars of the languages of the North Caucasus and Dagestan. Nalchik, pages 94-95.

Aliyev U.B. (1959). Questions of complex sentences in Russian and Turkic languages. Cherkessk.

Akhmanova, O.S., Mikaelyan, G.B. (1963). Modern syntactic theories. Moscow University Edition.

Beloshapkova V.A. (1967). Complicated sentence in modern Russian, Some questions of the theory. Moscow, Enlightenment.

Bokarev A.A. (1949). Avar language syntax. Moscow – Leningrad.

Gadzhiev M. M. To the question of simple and complex sentence in Lezgian language. - "Languages of Dagestan.Vol.1, Makhachkala, 1948, pp. 73-85

Desheriev Yu.D. (1953). Batsbi language. Moscow, p.292.

Dyrenkova N.P. (1940). The grammar of the Oirot language. Moscow - Leningrad, p. 269-271,275.

Imnashvili D.S. (1963). Didoy language in comparison with Hinuh and Khvarshin languages. Tbilisi, Vol. 189,199,202.

Khaydakov S.M. (1963). Complicated subordinate sentence in the Lak and Archi languages. Questions of descriptive grammars of the North Caucasus and Daghestan. Nalchik, p.82.

Kononov A.N. (1956). Grammar of the modern Turkish literary language, M.-L., p. 538.

Murkelinsky G.B. (1963). On a complex sentence in Dagestan languages 1963.Questions of descriptive grammars of the languages of the North Caucasus and Datetan.Nalchik, 1963., p.81.

Ozdoev, I.A. (1964). Syntax of the Ingush literary language. A simple sentence. IZVESTIYA CHINIIIL, T.U, Vol.2. Linguistics. Terrible, p.7.

Pospelov N.S. (1950). On the grammatical nature of complex sentences. Questions of the syntax of the modern Russian language. Moscow, p. 323.

Rogava G.V., Kerasheva Z.I. (1966). The grammar of the Adyghe language. Krasnodar-Maikop, p.434.

Rudnev A.G. (1968). The syntax of the modern Russian language. Moscow, Higher School, p. 241.

Saidov M.S. (1954). Expanded members of the sentence in Avar language. Languages of Dagestan. Issue 2. Makhachkala, p. 84.

Serebrennikov B.A. (1963). Principles of writing descriptive grammars, "Questions of descriptive grammars of the languages of North Caucasus and Dagestan, Nalchik, P.38.

Shagirov A.K. (1966). To the problem of a complex sentence in the Kabardino-Circassian language. Questions of descriptive grammars of the languages of the North Caucasus and Dagestan.

Shrazhev M.S. (1956). Complicated sentence in the Azerbaijani language, VA, L. I, pp.94-95.

Sizova I.A. (1966). What is the syntax? Moscow, Science.

Sobolevsky S.I. (1950). Grammar of the Latin Language. Part 1, Morphology and Syntax. Moscow, p. 219.

Sukhotin V.P. (1950). The problem of phrases in the modern Russian language. Issues of syntax of the modern Russian language. Moscow, p. 162.

Yakovlev N.F. (1940). The syntax of the Chechen literary language. Moscow – Leningrad, p. 176.