Interaction between the authorities and the non-profit sector in Russian Federation: resources and development constraints

Elena V. Frolova; Natalia V. Medvedeva; Tatyana M. Ryabova; Olga V. Rogach; Lyudmila V. Senicheva

Elena V. Frolova Department of Management and Administration Russian State Social University, Russian Federation
Natalia V. Medvedeva Department of Management and Administration; Russian State Social University, Russian Federation
Tatyana M. Ryabova Department of Management and Administration; Russian State Social University, Russian Federation
Olga V. Rogach Department of Management and Administration; Russian State Social University, Russian Federation
Lyudmila V. Senicheva Department of Management and Administration Russian State Social University, Russian Federation

Keywords: Non-profit organizations, authorities, development resources, intersector partnership, support mechanisms.

Abstract

The aim of the work is to study the conditions of Russian NPO functioning, the key problems and the trends of their development, and to develop the mechanisms that provide constructive practices for cooperation between the state and the non-profit sector. The results of statistical studies illustrate a high level of territorial differentiation among the representatives of the non-commercial sector, which creates inequality in terms of access to social services, the opportunities to meet the social needs of the population, the development of civil society, the involvement of social groups for the development and the implementation of managerial decisions in the social sphere. A low level of financial and infrastructural security of NPO activities, the lack of voluntary support lead to the reduction of trends and the volume of social assistance for the population. Currently, the interaction of local government and non-profit public organizations is characterized by rather narrow models of cooperation. The leading mechanism that can provide the necessary modernization of non-profit organization activities, the increase of their role and representation in public problem solution, is an intersectoral social partnership that can provide constructive coordination of key agent positions in the social space, an effective interaction of government bodies, population and public organizations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Elena V. Frolova, Department of Management and Administration Russian State Social University, Russian Federation

Doctor of sociological sciences, professor of the Department of Management and Administration Russian State Social University, Russian Federation

Natalia V. Medvedeva, Department of Management and Administration; Russian State Social University, Russian Federation

Candidate of sociological sciences, assistant professor at the Department of Management and Administration; Russian State Social University, Russian Federation

Tatyana M. Ryabova, Department of Management and Administration; Russian State Social University, Russian Federation

Candidate of sociological sciences, assistant professor at the Department of Management and Administration;
Russian State Social University, Russian Federation

Olga V. Rogach, Department of Management and Administration; Russian State Social University, Russian Federation

Candidate of sociological sciences, assistant professor at the Department of Management and Administration;
Russian State Social University, Russian Federation

Lyudmila V. Senicheva, Department of Management and Administration Russian State Social University, Russian Federation

Senior lecturer of the Department of Management and Administration Russian State Social University, Russian Federation

References

Audretsch D.B., Wessner C. (2005). Local Heroes in the Global Village. Globalization and New Entrepreneurship Policies, New York: Springer Science + Media Inc.

Breschi S. (1997). Sectoral systems of innovation: technological regimes, Schumpeterian dynamics and spatial boundaries // Edquist C. (ed), Systems of innovation. F Pinter, London, pp. 130-156.

Carlsson B. (1991). On the nature, function and composition of technological systems / B. Carlsson, R. Stankiewicz // Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 1. Issue 2. - pp. 93-118.

Chesbrough H. W. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology // Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Cooke P. (1992). Regional innovation systems: competitive regulation in the new Europe // Geoforum, № 23. - pp. 365-382

Esina Yu.L., Stepanenkova N.M., Agafonova E.E. (2015). Forms and mechanisms of science, education and business community integration in the context of regional economy innovative renewal. // Creative economics. V.9. No. 12. pp. 1491-1508

Etzkowitz H. (1995). The Triple Helix University-Industry-Government Relations: a Laboratory for Knowledge-Based Economic Development // EASST Review, — Vol. 14. — № 1. — pp. 14-19.

Federal service of state statistics. (2018). // official site - Access mode: http://www.gks.ru/ Reference date: 20.0.2018.

Itskovits G. (2010). Triple helix: Universities - Enterprises - State: Innovations in action. Tomsk: Publishing house of Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics, 238 p.

Ivanova N. (2002). National Innovation Systems // Moscow: Nauka, 224 p.

Kuzubov A. A. (2017). Innovative business interests as an integral part of post-industrial economy // Azimuth of Scientific Research: Economics and Administration. Т. 6. № 1(18). pp. 87-90.

Lundvall B.-A. (1994). The Learning Economy // Journal of Industry Studies, Vol. 1. - pp. 23-42;

Maxwell I. (2009). Managing Sustainable Innovation: The Driver for Global Growth // NewYork: Springer.

Mukhamedyarov A.M., Divaeva, E.A. (2011). Foreign experience in a regional innovation system development // Economics and management. № 3. pp. 92-99

Nelson Еd. R. (1993). National systems of innovation: A comparative study // Oxford University Press.

North D. (2000). Інституції, іституційна зміна та функціонування економіки // К: Основи, 2000. – 198 p.

Regional Innovation Scoreboard. (2014). // European Union, 2014.

Russell M. G. et al. (2011). Transforming Innovation Ecosystems through Shared Vision and Network Orchestration //Triple Helix IX International Conference. Stanford.

Russell M. G. (2011). Transforming Innovation Ecosystems through Shared Vision and Network Orchestration // Triple Helix IX International Conference. Stanford.

Shashlo N. V. (2017). Organizational and economic model of activization of innovative investment activities of the industrial enterprises // Azimuth of Scientific Research: Economics and Administration, V. 6. № 4(21). pp. 279-282.

Shashlo N.V., Petruk G.V. (2017). The Consumer Value of Knowledge in the Innovative Ecosystem of the Russian Far East // University Management: Practice and Analysis, Vol. 21. No. 5 (111). pp. 93-102.

Smorodinskaya N.V. (2015). The globalized economy: from hierarchies to the network way of life. M.: Institute of Ecology, RAS, 344 p.

Sverker A. (2000). Corporate Innovation Systems / A. Sverker, J. Staffan, S. Soren, O. Christer, N. Teknlic. - Goteborg: Chalmers University of Technology.

Svetlov V.A. (2017). Modern Logic: Textbook. - St. Petersburg.: Peter, 2006. - 400 p.

Venture investment and the ecosystem of technological entrepreneurship [collection of articles] // Russian Venture Company. - Moscow: Business Journal, 2011. - 96 p.