Determinants of integration interaction among the subjects of the entrepreneurial innovation ecosystem of macro region

  • Nina Vladimirovna Shashlo Department Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service Russian Federation
  • Galina Vladimirovna Petruk Department Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service Russian Federation
  • Aleksandr Alekseevich Korostelev Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "Togliatti State University" Russia
Keywords: Entrepreneurial innovation ecosystem, innovative products, commercialization, entrepreneurial structures, interaction, macroregion, knowledge, information, technology, innovative product.

Abstract

The purpose of this research paper is to study the essence of the entrepreneurial innovation ecosystem of the Russian Far East as the center for the generation of knowledge, as well as the elaboration of the trends for institutional environment development of the macro region innovation ecosystem, which will allow us to determine the trends of innovative development for RF universities of Far East. The article describes the content and the main features of innovative ecosystems, based on the comparative analysis of scientific approaches to the characterization of ecosystems, their key components and interaction features are characterized. From the point of view of the system approach, they formulated the interpretation of entrepreneurial innovation ecosystem category as an open dynamic self-organizing and self-developing system consisting of organizational, structural and functional components (institutions) and their interrelations, creating, consuming and transforming scientific knowledge and ideas into innovative products within a complex matrix of relations between its constituent elements. They traced the process of information transformation into innovative products within the entrepreneurial innovation ecosystem. Using the decoding of the entrepreneurial innovation ecosystem by the method of two-level triadic decoding, it is revealed that the ecosystem unites the educational, scientific and entrepreneurial spheres, is based on the processes of generation, transfer and commercialization of knowledge, information and technologies. They gave the characteristics of some elements of the intellectual component of the economy of Russia and the Far East. The problems are identified that negatively affect the state of the innovative ecosystem of the Far Eastern Federal District of Russia. They proved the need to develop the methodological approaches to the evaluation of innovative territorial formation - the territorial innovation ecosystem of the macroregion. It was indicated that in order to develop the model of the entrepreneurial innovation ecosystem of the macroregion it is necessary to create a modern network system of university science on the basis of "digital production" concept. They formed the priority trends of innovative development of universities for the Russian Far East and the innovation ecosystem of the macroregion in the article. The novelty and the originality of the conducted research is to identify the integration interrelations of the entrepreneurial innovation ecosystem subjects of the Far Eastern Federal District of Russia and it is reflected in the development of innovative development trends of the universities in the Russian Far East and the institutional environment of the macroregion innovation ecosystem. This article is of particular value for the subjects of the entrepreneurial innovation ecosystem, which need to carry out a targeted integration interaction with each other and the external environment, which is the actual problem of the macroregion ecosystem management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Nina Vladimirovna Shashlo, Department Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service Russian Federation

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Economics
Head of Postgraduate and Doctoral Study Department Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service
Russian Federation

Galina Vladimirovna Petruk, Department Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service Russian Federation

Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Management
Director of Scientific Research Department Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service
Russian Federation

Aleksandr Alekseevich Korostelev, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "Togliatti State University" Russia

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Director of the Center for Scientific Journals The Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "Togliatti State University" Russia

References

Chesbrough H. W. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology // Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Etzkowitz H. (1995). The Triple Helix University-Industry-Government Relations: a Laboratory for Knowledge-Based Economic Development // EASST Review, — Vol. 14. — № 1. — pp. 14-19.

Itskovits G. (2010). Triple helix: Universities - Enterprises - State: Innovations in action. Tomsk: Publishing house of Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics, 238 p.

Russell M. G. (2011). Transforming Innovation Ecosystems through Shared Vision and Network Orchestration // Triple Helix IX International Conference. Stanford.

Maxwell I. (2009). Managing Sustainable Innovation: The Driver for Global Growth // NewYork: Springer.

Lundvall B.-A. (1994). The Learning Economy // Journal of Industry Studies, Vol. 1. - pp. 23-42;

Ivanova N. (2002). National Innovation Systems // Moscow: Nauka, 224 p.

Cooke P. (1992). Regional innovation systems: competitive regulation in the new Europe // Geoforum, № 23. - pp. 365-382

Breschi S. (1997). Sectoral systems of innovation: technological regimes, Schumpeterian dynamics and spatial boundaries // Edquist C. (ed), Systems of innovation. F Pinter, London, pp. 130-156.

Carlsson B. (1991). On the nature, function and composition of technological systems / B. Carlsson, R. Stankiewicz // Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 1. Issue 2. - pp. 93-118.

Sverker A. (2000). Corporate Innovation Systems / A. Sverker, J. Staffan, S. Soren, O. Christer, N. Teknlic. - Goteborg: Chalmers University of Technology.

Smorodinskaya N.V. (2015). The globalized economy: from hierarchies to the network way of life. M.: Institute of Ecology, RAS, 344 p.

Nelson Еd. R. (1993). National systems of innovation: A comparative study // Oxford University Press. Regional Innovation Scoreboard. (2014). // European Union, 2014.

Audretsch D.B., Wessner C. (2005). Local Heroes in the Global Village. Globalization and New Entrepreneurship Policies, New York: Springer Science + Media Inc.

Russell M. G. et al. (2011). Transforming Innovation Ecosystems through Shared Vision and Network Orchestration //Triple Helix IX International Conference. Stanford.

Kuzubov A. A. (2017). Innovative business interests as an integral part of post-industrial economy // Azimuth of Scientific Research: Economics and Administration. Т. 6. № 1(18). pp. 87-90.

Mukhamedyarov A.M., Divaeva, E.A. (2011). Foreign experience in a regional innovation system development // Economics and management. № 3. pp. 92-99

Esina Yu.L., Stepanenkova N.M., Agafonova E.E. (2015). Forms and mechanisms of science, education and business community integration in the context of regional economy innovative renewal. // Creative
economics. V.9. No. 12. pp. 1491-1508

North D. (2000). Інституції, іституційна зміна та функціонування економіки // К: Основи, 2000. – 198 p.

Venture investment and the ecosystem of technological entrepreneurship [collection of articles] // Russian Venture Company. - Moscow: Business Journal, 2011. - 96 p.

Svetlov V.A. (2017). Modern Logic: Textbook. - St. Petersburg.: Peter, 2006. - 400 p.
Federal service of state statistics. (2018). // official site - Access mode: http://www.gks.ru/ Reference date:
20.0.2018.

Shashlo N.V., Petruk G.V. (2017). The Consumer Value of Knowledge in the Innovative Ecosystem of the Russian Far East // University Management: Practice and Analysis, Vol. 21. No. 5 (111). pp. 93-102.

Shashlo N. V. (2017). Organizational and economic model of activization of innovative investment activities of the industrial enterprises // Azimuth of Scientific Research: Economics and Administration, V. 6. № 4(21).
pp. 279-282.
Published
2018-04-30
How to Cite
Shashlo, N., Petruk, G., & Korostelev, A. (2018). Determinants of integration interaction among the subjects of the entrepreneurial innovation ecosystem of macro region. Amazonia Investiga, 7(13), 351-363. Retrieved from https://www.amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/569
Section
Articles