Discursive-Pragmatic Modeling of the Language Image

N. F. Alefirenko; А. Т. Gigolayeva; O. V. Dekhnich; I. I. Chumak-Zhun’

N. F. Alefirenko State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “Belgorod National Research University”, Belgorod, Russia
А. Т. Gigolayeva Institution of Higher Education “Belgorod National Research University”, Belgorod, Russia.
O. V. Dekhnich Institution of Higher Education “Belgorod National Research University”, Belgorod, Russia
I. I. Chumak-Zhun’ Institution of Higher Education “Belgorod National Research University”, Belgorod, Russia

Keywords: linguistic image, linguistic personality, cognitive-communicative event, ideologeme, cultureme, concept.

Abstract

The paper considers the problems of language modeling of the image of the world, allowing to recreate the basic concepts, topics of reality they represent. A special place is occupied among them by the modeling of the subjective image of a charismatic personality, which in one way or another personifies the life-sense of his era (Peter I, mother Theresa, Iron Lady, Theresa May, etc.). The focus is on the spiritual, physical and ideological modi of the created language image, its suggestive interaction and the development of society. The peculiarity of the linguistic image is that the person is synergistically recreated, he is not outside of the subjective attitude of the author of the text, whether it is mass media or artistic and historical texts. Though subjective, the linguistic image is created through the speech interpretation of realities. The linguistic image embodies the real world with the help of semantic dynamics of words, representing ideologemes, culturemes and concepts as cognitive-discursive constructs of a socially significant event.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

N. F. Alefirenko, State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “Belgorod National Research University”, Belgorod, Russia

D. of Philology, Professor, Honored Worker of Science of RF, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “Belgorod National Research University”, Belgorod, Russia

А. Т. Gigolayeva, Institution of Higher Education “Belgorod National Research University”, Belgorod, Russia.

Ph D Student, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “Belgorod National Research University”, Belgorod, Russia.

O. V. Dekhnich, Institution of Higher Education “Belgorod National Research University”, Belgorod, Russia

Cand. Sc. Philology, Associate Professor, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “Belgorod National Research University”, Belgorod, Russia

I. I. Chumak-Zhun’, Institution of Higher Education “Belgorod National Research University”, Belgorod, Russia

D. of Philology, Professor, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “Belgorod National Research University”, Belgorod, Russia

References

Alefirenko, N. (2014). Formation and development of discourse linguistic theory. XLinguae: European Scientific Language Journal, 7(2), 32-44.

Alefirenko, N. F. (2013). Linguoculturology: Axiological Space of Language. – М., 288 p.

Alefirenko, N., & Nurtazina, M. (2018). Metaphorical Discourse: in Search for the Essence of Speech Imagery. CUADERNOS DE RUSISTICA ESPANOLA, 14, 49-65.

Bahremand, A. (2015). The concept of translation in different teaching approaches and methods. UCT Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research, 3(1), 5-9.

Barthes, R. (1966). Introduction à l'analyse structurale des récits. Communications, 8(1), 1-27.

Gak, V. G. (1998). Language Transformations. – М.: Languages of Russian Culture, 768 p.

Kolshansky, G. V. (2013). Objective Worldview in Language Acquisition. Publishing Editor А. М. Shakhnarovich. The 5th Edition. – М.: LIBROKOM, 120 p.

Kosharnaya, S. A. (2014). Linguistic Persona in the Context of Ethno-Culture. М.: Direct-Media.

Likhachev, D. S. (1996). Conceptual Sphere of the Russian Language. Essays on the Philosophy of Artistic Expression. SP: Russian Baltic Information Center BLITZ, 139–156.

Mendonça, C. M. C. D., & Andrade, A. M. V. D. (2018). Dynamic Capabilities and Their Relations with Elements of Digital Transformation in Portugal. Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management, 3(3), 23.

Metsämuuronen, J. (2018). Common Framework for Mathematics – Discussions of Possibilities to Develop a Set of General Standards for Assessing Proficiency in Mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(2), 13-39. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/2693

Revzina, О. G. (1999). Language and Discourse. Herald of the Moscow University. Series 9. Philology, 1, 25—33

Suedfeld, P., & Tetlock, P. (1977). Integrative complexity of communications in international crises. Journal of conflict resolution, 21(1), 169-184.

Todorov, T. (2013). Introduction à la littérature fantastique. Le Seuil.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1980). Text and context explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse.

Vorobiyov, V. V. (2008). Linguoculturology. – М.: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia Publishing, 340 p.

Zwin, H. P. (2006). Les Systèmes complexes. Mathématique et biologie. – Paris, 210 p.