Psychological tendencies in teaching non-native language to junior schoolchildren

  • Gulshat F. Shakirova Kazan Federal University
  • Firaz F. Kharisov Kazan Federal University
  • Chulpan M. Kharisova Kazan Federal University
Keywords: Psychological features, junior schoolchildren, learning, memory, perception, thinking, speech, nonnative language.

Abstract

Psychological tendencies of language learning are described in this article. The interrelation between teaching language and such psychological components as perception, memory, attention, thinking, speech, etc. is considered.Some patterns of teaching Tatar language as nonnative language to junior schoolchildren are analyzed. The personal qualities of children of primary school age that can help in teaching are identified. The important advantage of teaching Tatar language in multilingual space allows more efficient organization of training and build it as close as possible to the natural process of using the native language. It is established that mastering speech skills in the Tatar language has positive effect on the psychological and physiological capabilities of students of primary school age. It is concluded that an important condition for the successful learning of a non-native language is to take into account the individual characteristics of students who depend on the nature of the environment and the child's ability to assimilate the learning material through memorization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Gulshat F. Shakirova, Kazan Federal University

Kazan Federal University

Firaz F. Kharisov, Kazan Federal University

Kazan Federal University

Chulpan M. Kharisova, Kazan Federal University

Kazan Federal University

References

Abduraximov, A. (2015). Psychological peculiarity of intellectual activity//European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 3(2). PP. 54-60.

Bayanova, L. (2013). Vygotsky's Hamlet: The dialectic method and personality psychology // Psychology in Russia: State of the Art. Issue 1. PP. 35-42.

Efimenko, S. (2010). Development of psychophysiological mechanisms of speaking on classes in a foreign language in technical college // News of Southern Federal University. Technical science. 10 (111).

Fischer J., Rettig M. (2004). Dysgraphia: When Writing Hurts//National Association of Elementary School Principals, 84(2).

Galperin, Y. (1995). Psychology as objective science.M.

Galskova N., Nikitenko Z. N. (2004). Theory and practice of training in foreign languages. Elementary school: Methodical grant. M.: Iris Press, 240 p.

Galskova N., Nikitenko Z. N. (2004). Theory and practice of training in foreign languages. Elementary school.Methodical grant. M.: Iris Press, 240 p.

Gardner R. (2011). The socio-educational model of second language acquisition // Canadian Issues, PP. 24–27.

Harisov, F. (2001). Tatar technique bases as nonnative at schools with training Russian / Under the editorship of L. Z. Shakirova. St. Petersburg: Education, 431 p.

Horlacher, R. (2011). Schooling as a means of popular education: Pestalozzi's method as a popular education experiment//"PaedagogicaHistorica", Vol. 47. PP. 65– 75.

Kalimullin, A. (2014). Improvement of teachers' qualification at Kazan federal university//World Applied Sciences Journal. 30 (4).PP. 447-450.

Katsnelson, S. (1972). Typology of language and speech mshleniye. L.: Science, Leningr.otd-e, 215 p.

Kharisova, C., Kharisov, F, Shakirova, G. (2015). Psycho-pedagogical basis of mother-tongue education. Journal of Language and Literature.6(3). PP. 155–158.

Luriya A. (1979). Language and consciousness. – M.: Moscow publishing house,. 319 p.

Nemeth, K. (2012). Basics of Supporting Dual Language Learners // Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children, PP. 35-36.

Petrovsky, A. (2007). Psikhologiya and time. SPb.: St. Petersburg, 448 p.

Shakirova, G. (2017). Psychological Features of Children in the Digital Age.Int J Sci Stud, 5(6).PP.176-179.

Stukalenko, N., Vachugov M. V. (2014). A role of informative processes of training in a foreign language // The International magazine of experimental education. 8(2). PP. 82-83.

Tomlinson H. and Hyson, M. (2012). Cognitive development in the preschool years//Growing minds: Building strong cognitive foundations in early childhood, PP. 13–24.

Vygotsky, L. (1999). Thinking and speech. Prod. 5. M. Labirint publishing house, 352 pages.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1999). Thinking and speech. Prod. 5. M.: Labirint publishing house, 352 p.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1999). Thinking and speech. Prod. 5. M.: Labirint publishing house. 352 p.

Winter, I. (1985). Personal and activity approach in training in Russian as foreign//Russian abroad. No. 5.

Wood C., Wrenn P. (1999). Time to teach, time to learn: Changing the pace of school//Greenfield, MA: Northeast Foundation for Children.
Published
2018-04-30
How to Cite
Shakirova, G., Kharisov, F., & Kharisova, C. (2018). Psychological tendencies in teaching non-native language to junior schoolchildren. Amazonia Investiga, 7(13), 215-220. Retrieved from https://www.amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/545
Section
Articles
Bookmark and Share