Sociolinguistic aspect of teaching turkish languages as a second language

  • Liliya A. Nurova Kazan Federal University
  • Firaz F. Kharisov Kazan Federal University
  • Chulpan M. Kharisova Kazan Federal University
  • Liliya M. Giniyatullina Kazan Federal University
Keywords: Teaching, Tatar language, sociolinguistics, bilingualism, state language.

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problem of teaching one of the Turkish languages – Tatar language as a non-native language in the conditions of the Republic of Tatarstan of the Russian Federation. It emphasizes the importance of taking into account the sociolinguistic aspect, as an effective means of teaching.
In the educational organizations of Tatarstan, after the adoption of the "Law about peoples languages of the Republic of Tatarstan", multilingualism successfully functions. Students study Tatar, Russian and one foreign language. In addition, national schools are required to learn their native language (for example, Chuvash, Udmurt, Bashkir, Mari etc.).
Conducting balanced language policy in the field of education serves mutual understanding, respect for the spiritual values of peoples, the development of their language and culture. The state status of the Tatar and Russian languages should be ensured by their parity use in all government bodies, enterprises and organizations, in the media, in the spheres of science, culture, service etc.
Since Tatar and Russian languages are state-owned in the republic, national-Russian and Russian-national parity bilingualism is the basis for the harmonization of interpersonal relations in a multinational state. In addition, Tatar language knowledge provides an opportunity to communicate with many representatives of the Turkish-speaking countries. 

The results presented in the article will help to solve the problems of creating comfortable conditions to master communicative, linguistic and ethnocultural competencies, and effective methods for solving learning issues and other Turkic languages.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Liliya A. Nurova, Kazan Federal University

Kazan Federal University, Leo Tolstoy Institute of Philology and Intercultural Communication, Russia

Firaz F. Kharisov, Kazan Federal University

Kazan Federal University, Leo Tolstoy Institute of Philology and Intercultural Communication, Russia

Chulpan M. Kharisova, Kazan Federal University

Kazan Federal University, Leo Tolstoy Institute of Philology and Intercultural Communication, Russia

Liliya M. Giniyatullina, Kazan Federal University

Kazan Federal University, Leo Tolstoy Institute of Philology and Intercultural Communication, Russia

References

Kharisova, C., Kharisov, F., Shakirova G. (2015). Psycho-pedagogical basis of mother-tongue education. Journal of Language and Literature. 6(3). PP. 155–158.

Yusupov, R., Aydarova S., Sagdieva R., Harisova G. (2015). Improving efficiency of teaching the Tatar language to a foreign audience // International Education Studies. 8(5). РP. 158–164.

Desheriyev, Y., Protchenko I. (2010). Key aspects of the study of bilingualism and multilingualism // Problems of bilingualism and multilingualism. 1976. P. 23.

Efimenko, S. (2011). Development of psychophysiological mechanisms of speaking on classes in a foreign language in technical college // News of Southern Federal University. Technical science. 111 (10).

Gardner R. (2011). The socio-educational model of second language acquisition // Canadian Issues, РP. 24–27.

Horlacher R. (2011). Schooling as a means of popular education: Pestalozzi's method as a popular education experiment // "Paedagogica Historica". Vol. 47. PP. 65–75.

Nemeth K. (2012). Basics of Supporting Dual Language Learners // Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children, PP. 35–36.

Shakirova G. (2014). Intrapersonal Gender Role Conflict of Self-Actualized Personality. World Applied Sciences Journal. 30 (4). PP. 460–462.

Tomlinson H., Hyson M. (2012). Cognitive development in the preschool years // Growing minds: Building strong cognitive foundations in early childhood, PP. 13–24.

Amirova J. (2013). Sociolinguistics: Educational-methodical complex. – Almaty,– 213 p.

Sokolov A.V. (2002). General theory of social communication: textbook. SPb.: Publishing house of V.A. Mikhailov,– 165 p.

Shakirova, G., Kharisova, C., Kharisov, F. (2016). The development of language competence of students in the study of native language morphology. Journal of Language and Literature, 7(1). PP. 227–234.
Published
2018-04-30
How to Cite
Nurova, L., Kharisov, F., Kharisova, C., & Giniyatullina, L. (2018). Sociolinguistic aspect of teaching turkish languages as a second language. Amazonia Investiga, 7(13), 174-179. Retrieved from https://www.amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/537
Section
Articles
Bookmark and Share