Political and socio-economic factors of weakening the idea of the rule of law in a risk society

Elena Vladimirovna Parkhomenko; Elena Fedorovna Kuzemina; Nataliya Viktorovna Pashkova; Tatiana Rashitovna Khannanova; Evgeniya Nikolayevna Bashirina

Elena Vladimirovna Parkhomenko Institute of Fundamental Sciences. Kuban State Technological University, Russia.
Elena Fedorovna Kuzemina Institute of Fundamental Sciences. Kuban State Technological University, Russia
Nataliya Viktorovna Pashkova Institute of Fundamental Sciences. Kuban State Technological University, Russia.
Tatiana Rashitovna Khannanova Institute of History and Public Administration. Bashkir State University, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia.
Evgeniya Nikolayevna Bashirina Bashkir State University, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia.

Keywords: Legal consciousness, legal idea, the rule of law, risk society.

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to analyze why the idea of the rule of law does not coincide with social and legal practice and what kind of deformations of the individual and public legal consciousness this engenders. Methods: The authors used systemic and dialectical approaches when identifying the indicators of legal consciousness deformation associated with the extremes of the absence or exaltation of the idea of the rule of law. Results: The authors identified cultural, political, socio-economic factors weakening the idea of the rule of law in a risk society. The peculiarity of the formation of legal consciousness in a risk society is that it experiences the influence of two groups of factors. The first is social instability caused by the consequences of globalization, technization, commercialization, the lag of legal regulation of risk from the avalanche-like spread and escalation of risks; the formal and relative nature of the differences in legal and illegal behavior. Conclusion: The identified factors limit the possibility of legal consciousness in the creative understanding of the legal order, which is an additional risk factor.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Elena Vladimirovna Parkhomenko, Institute of Fundamental Sciences. Kuban State Technological University, Russia.

Senior Lecturer at the Department of History, Philosophy and Psychology, Institute of Fundamental Sciences. Kuban State Technological University, Russia.

Elena Fedorovna Kuzemina, Institute of Fundamental Sciences. Kuban State Technological University, Russia

Associate Professor at the Department of History, Philosophy and Psychology, Institute of Fundamental Sciences. Kuban State Technological University, Russia

Nataliya Viktorovna Pashkova, Institute of Fundamental Sciences. Kuban State Technological University, Russia.

Associate Professor at the Department of History, Philosophy and Psychology, Institute of Fundamental Sciences. Kuban State Technological University, Russia.

Tatiana Rashitovna Khannanova, Institute of History and Public Administration. Bashkir State University, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia.

Professor at the Department of Public Administration, Institute of History and Public Administration. Bashkir State University, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia.

Evgeniya Nikolayevna Bashirina, Bashkir State University, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia.

Associate Professor at the Department of Economic and Legal Security Provision, Faculty of Philosophy and Sociology. Bashkir State University, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russia.

References

Beck, U. (2009). Critical theory of world risk society: A cosmopolitan vision. Constellations, 16(1), 1–20.

Ellersgaard, C., Larsen, A., & Munk, M. (2012). A very economic elite: the case of the Danish top CEOs. Sociology, 47(6), 1051–1071. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038512454349

Brar, D. (2018). Keep the Patels: How culturally competent teamwork can alleviate the law’s diversity retention problem. Asian American Law Journal, 25(1), 123–143.

Brownsword, R. (2019). Law, Technology and Society: Reimagining the Regulatory Environment. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351128186

Foucault, М. (1988). Technologies of the Self. University of Massachusets Press.

Glotina, I.M. (2014). Kiberprestupnost': osnovnyye proyavleniya i ekonomicheskiye posledstviya [Cybercrime: main manifestations and economic consequences]. Voprosy Ekonomiki i Prava, 8, 11-15. https://law-journal.ru/files/pdf/201408/201408_11.pdf

Jacobs, D. (2015). Extreme wealth is not merited. Oxfam discussion papers, November. https://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/file_attachments/dp-extreme-wealth-is-not-merited-241115-en.pdf.

Kortunov, S.V. (2009). Covremennaya vneshnyaya politika Rossii. Strategiya izbiratel'noy vovlechennosti [Modern Russian foreign policy. Selective Engagement Strategy]. Мoscow: Higher School of Economics.

Krasilnikova, Yu. I. (2016, December 23). II pozvolit nezametno poddelyvat' foto i video [AI will provide quiet fake photos and videos]. Official website of Autonomous Noncommercial Organization “Innopolis Media”. https://hightech.fm/2016/12/23/image_manipulation.

Lukmanova, R.Kh., & Sirazetdinova, M.F. (2016). Osnovnyye printsipy protivodeistviya manipulyatsii soznaniyem [The fundamental principles of resistance to consciousness manipulation]. Bulletin of the Volgograd University. Series: Social Technologies, 1(31), 43–49.
https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26289563.

Pozdyaeva, S.M. (2011). Criminal forms of sociality as a brake on Russian modernization. In Russia in the global world. Proceedings of the 9th All-Russian Scientific-Theoretical Conference (pp. 245–248). St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State Polytechnic University. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24455849

Rakhmatullin, R.Yu. (2014). Erich Neumann on the role of the “scapegoat” in the formation of the conflict. Young Scientist, 13, 235–237. https://moluch.ru/archive/72/12320/

Shakirova, E. Yu. (2013). Aksiologicheskaya rizomorfnost' sotsiuma: zona eskalatsii sotsial'noy riskogennosti [Axiological rhizomorphism of society: an escalation zone of social risk escalation] Izvestiya SGU. Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika, 13(4), 36–41. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21084716.

Sirazetdinova, M.F. (2014). Sotsial'no-gumanitarnoye znaniye i iskusstvennyy intellekt [Social and humanitarian knowledge and artificial intelligence]. In: ITIDS+RRS'2014 Second Conference Proceedings (pp. 207–209, vol. 2), Ufa, Russia: Ufa State Aviation Technical University. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21739446.

Sprague, J. (2015). Empire, global capitalism, and theory: Reconsidering Hardt and Negri. The Diversity of Social Theories, 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0278-1204(2011)0000029014.

Tampubolon, G. & Savage, М. (2012). Intergenerational and intragenerational social mobility in Britain. In Lambert, P.S., Connelly, R., Blackburn, M., Gayle, V. S. (eds.), Social Stratification: Trends and Processes (pp. 115–131). Ashgate: Aldershot.

Tumbinskaya, M.V. (2017). The process of disseminating unwanted information in social networks. Business Informatics, 3(41), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.17323/1998-0663.2017.3.65.76