Social entrepreneurship in northern Russia: new opportunities for development
Abstract
The main purpose of the article is to develop and substantiate the co-evolutionary model “Social entrepreneur – State institutions – Population” on the example of the Northern region of Russia. The relevance of the study is determined by the need to find and use new innovative resources of socio-economic development of the North. Violation of the socio-economic balance leads to the fact that citizens in need of special social protection become the most vulnerable in the North. Results demonstrated that this situation creates a high level of social tension. In such circumstances, an important role can be assigned to “social entrepreneurs”, who with full responsibility can take over the execution of important social functions. The results of the study can be used by regional authorities, self-regulatory organizations, associations of social entrepreneurs, other interested institutions to justify the effectiveness of administrative decisions.
Downloads
References
Camagni, R., Capello, R. (2013). Regional innovation patterns and the EU regional policy reform: Toward smart innovation policies. Growth and change, 44(2), 355-389.
Capello, R., Lenzi, C. (2013). Territorial patterns of innovation: a taxonomy of innovative regions in Europe. The Annals of Regional Science, 51(1), 119-154.
Dagaeva, I.A., Markov, S.M., Markova, A.S. (2017). Social problems, social entrepreneurship, social oriented non-profit organizations, Economics and entrepreneurship.9(1). P. 454-458.
Dorokhov, Yu.V, Kokhanik, M.S. (2017). Social entrepreneurship in the region experience in qualitative research, Central Russian vestnik of social sciences. 12(1). P. 46-53.
Eremeev, E.I. (2018). Mechanisms of spatial development of the north on the basis of industrial and raw sites and industrial clusters. Modern Economy Success. 2. P. 9-14.
Guseva, I.I., Moshkin, I.V. (2017). Social entrepreneurship - development through interaction, Journal of Economics Management. Finance.1. P. 29-35.
Islamutdinov, V.F. (2016). Evolution and specificity of the economic institutions of Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug – Yugra. Economy of the region, 2, 463-470.
Islamutdinov, V.F. (2016). Institutions of stimulating the innovative behavior of economic agents in Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug – Yugra: Evolution, specificity and institutional traps. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6, 88-94.
Kuznetsov, A.O., Ignatyeva, T.A., & Kuznetsov, A.O. (2018). Strategy and key components of competitiveness development. Modern Economy Success. 1. P. 25-28.
Martin, R. L., Osberg, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: The case for definition (Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 28-39). Stanford, CA: Stanford social innovation review.
Naumenko, O.N., Naumenko, E.A. (2018). The Ob Ugrians-Muslims: Historical and Psychological Factors of the Islam Penetration in the Traditional Culture. Bylye Gody, 49 (3), 931-939.
Pilyasov, A. N. (2016). Russia’s arctic frontier: paradoxes of development. Regional Research of Russia, 6(3), 227-239.
Prasolov, V. I., & Kesego, M. (2017). The Risk-Oriented model of Economic Security of a Business Entity. Modern Economy Success, (1), 4-10.
Pronina, E. N. (2017). Modelling of Russian Industrial Cycles. Успехи современной науки и образования (2412-9631).
Rostovskaya, T.K., Shimanovskaya, Ya.V. (2017). Social entrepreneurship as a form of social services, population, Fotinsky reading. 2. P. 275-282.
Seelos, C., Mair, J. (2005). Social entrepreneurship: Creating new business models to serve the poor. Business horizons, 48(3), 241-246.
Takmashеva, I. V., Lebedeva, I. D., Sannikov, D. V., & Tashlanova, Y. V. (2018). Study of parameters characterizing formation of business environment in the northern regions in the context of innovation-driven economy. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 17(4).
.gif)
