Criminal group and group method of committing a crime in Russian criminal law

  • Vladimir I. Sidorov Law faculty
  • Sergei A. Baleev Law faculty, Kazan Federal University
Keywords: Institute of partnership, criminal group, group way of commission of crime, Russian criminal legislation.

Abstract

In this work the current state of institute of partnership in crime based on the analysis of statistical data which demonstrates to existence of problematic issues in definition of the concepts "criminal group", "group way of commission of crime", "partnership" that affects law-enforcement practice is considered.
It is necessary to recognize the increased public danger of the crimes committed by several persons as in such cases the criminal result is a consequence of the combined efforts of two and more persons. At the same time, at qualification of the crimes committed with use of a group way there are problems of their legal treatment at their commission, both within partnership, and beyond its limits.
Carrying out short historical digression in development of institute of partnership in the existing criminal legislation, analyzing opinions of scientists concerning differentiation of the concepts "criminal group", "group way of commission of crime", "partnership", the author of article proves need of development of the concept "group way of commission of crime" - by legislative fixing of this concept of the criminal legislation of the Russian Federation. For the purpose of improvement of institute of partnership, entering of corresponding changes into the Russian criminal legislation is offered.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Vladimir I. Sidorov, Law faculty

Law faculty

Sergei A. Baleev, Law faculty, Kazan Federal University

Law faculty, PhD in law, Kazan Federal University

References

Arutyunov A.A. Partnership in crime. M.: Statute. (2013). [electronic resource]. Access from Union of Right Forces ConsultantPlus.

Badar, M. E. (2006). " Just Convict Everyone!"-Joint Perpetration: From Tadic to Stakic and Back Again. International Criminal Law Review, 6(2), 293.

Badar, M. E., & Karsten, N. (2007). Current developments at the international criminal tribunals. International Criminal Law Review, 7(1), 163.

Borovykh, L. V., & Kirova, T. A. (2018). PROFESSIONAL STATUS OF MEDICAL WORKERS IN TERMS OF CRIMINAL LAW. Голубцов Валерий Геннадьевич, 478.

Calvo-Goller, K. N. (2006). The trial proceedings of the international criminal court. ICTY and ICTR precedents, 168.

Cassese, A., Acquaviva, G., Fan, M., & Whiting, A. (2011). International criminal law: cases and commentary. Oxford University Press.

Cassese, A., Acquaviva, G., Fan, M., & Whiting, A. (2011). International criminal law: cases and commentary. Oxford University Press.

Constitucio Criminalis Theresiana order der Romisch-kaiserlihen Majestat Mania Theresia peinlich Gerichtsordnung. - Wien, 1768. - 91 rivers.

Criminal law of Russia. The general and Special speak rapidly: The textbook for higher education institutions/N. Ivanov. - M.: Examination, 2003. - 343 pages.

Criminal law of the Russian Federation. General part: The textbook practical work / Under the editorship of A.S. Mikhlin. - M.: Yurist, 2004. - 494 pages.

Criminal law. General part: The textbook / Under the general editorship of V.I. Radchenko. - M.: Yustitsinform, 2004. - 784 pages.

Galiakbarov R.R. (1973). Group crime. Constant and variable signs. - Sverdlovsk, 140 pages.

Hasibuan, A. M., Saragih, S., & Amry, Z. (2018). Development of Learning Materials Based on Realistic Mathematics Education to Improve Problem Solving Ability and Student Learning Independence. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 243-252.

Jessberger, F., & Geneuss, J. (2008). On the Application of a Theory of Indirect Perpetration in Al Bashir: German Doctrine at The Hague?. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 6(5), 853-869.

Kadish, S. H. (1962). Some observations on the use of criminal sanctions in enforcing economic regulations. U. Chi. L. Rev., 30, 423.

Kopnin I.S. (2010). Responsibility of participants of criminal group: Law PhD. – Ryazan, 229 pages.

Kovalyov M.I. (1960). Partnership in crime: Concept of partnership. Scientific works. P.1. – Sverdlovsk. 288 pages.

Maculan, E. (2015). Judicial Definition of Torture as a Paradigm of Cross-fertilisation: Combining Harmonisation and Expansion. Nordic Journal of International Law, 84(3), 456-481.

Mälksoo, L. (2015). Russian Approaches to International Law. Oxford University Press, USA.

Maravilla, C. S. (2000). Rape as a War Crime: The Implications of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia's Decision in Prosecutor v. Kunarac, Kovac, & (and) Vukovic on International Humanitarian Law. Fla. J. Int'l L., 13, 321.

Mikheyev R.I. (1983). A criminal legal treatment of socially dangerous acts deranged at group encroachments//Current problems of fight against group crime. – Omsk, Page 1-19.

Onyinkwa, B. (2018). The Concept of “Protected Groups” Under the Genocide Convention in Relation to Developments in International Law Through Jurisprudence and Emergence of Similar Deserving Groups.

Pochinok, N. B. (2008). Contemporary Problems of Social Work. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, (4), 88-97.

Pochinok, N. B. (2008). Contemporary Problems of Social Work. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, (4), 88-97.

Prosecutor v. G.( September 2008). Katanga and M. Ngunjolo Chiu. Case N ICC-01/04-01/07. § 510.

Radzinowicz, S. L., & Turner, J. C. (Eds.). (1945). The modern approach to criminal law. Kraus reprint.

Raroga, A. (2010). Criminal law of the Russian Federation: general part.

Regushevskaya, E. (2009). Abortions and sexually transmitted infections among women in St. Petersburg in the early 2000s. Comparison by population based surveys in Estonia and Finland. Tampere University Press.

Rodley, N., & Pollard, M. (2009). The treatment of prisoners under international law. OUP Oxford.

Schabas W.A. (2006). The UN International Criminal Tribunals: The Former Yugoslavia, Rwanda and Sierra Leone. Cambridge, - 390 rubles.

Semukhina, O. B., & Reynolds, K. M. (2013). Understanding the modern Russian police. CRC Press.

Telnov P. F. (1971). Forms of partnership and qualification of crimes//USSR justice. No. 8. - Page 21-22.

Weisberg, R. (2000). Reappraising complicity. Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 4(1), 217-281.

Weller, M., Solomou, A., & Rylatt, J. W. (Eds.). (2015). The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law. Oxford University Press.

Williamson, J. A. (2002, September). Command responsibility in the case law of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. In Criminal Law Forum (Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 365-384). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Yepifanova E.V. (2002). Formation and development of institute of partnership in crime in Russia: Autoref. Law PhD Thesis. – Krasnodar,24 pages.
Published
2019-02-27
How to Cite
Sidorov, V., & Baleev, S. (2019). Criminal group and group method of committing a crime in Russian criminal law. Amazonia Investiga, 8(18), 330-336. Retrieved from https://www.amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/315
Section
Articles
Bookmark and Share