Vol. 13 No. 74 (2024)
Articles

Presumptions as means of proof in criminal procedure law of states with continental and Anglo-American legal systems

PDF HTML
  • Nazar Bobechko,
  • Volodymyr Fihurskyi
Nazar Bobechko
Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Ukraine.
Bio
Volodymyr Fihurskyi
Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Ukraine.
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2024.74.02.31

Published 2024-02-29

Keywords

  • criminal procedure law, process of proof, means of criminal procedural proof, legal presumptions, factual presumptions.

How to Cite

Bobechko, N., & Fihurskyi, V. (2024). Presumptions as means of proof in criminal procedure law of states with continental and Anglo-American legal systems. Amazonia Investiga, 13(74), 373–380. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2024.74.02.31

Abstract

The aim of this article is to study legal regulation, doctrinal approaches on understanding and using presumptions in criminal procedure proof of the states with continental and Anglo-American legal systems. The methodological basis of this research consists of general scientific and special legal methods, namely dialectical, analysis, generalization, structural and functional, hermeneutic, dogmatic and comparative legal methods. The article analyzes one of the means of criminal procedure proof – presumption. By analyzing the corresponding norms of CPC of Ukraine, legal positions of the European Court of Human Rights, Supreme Court of the USA and the views of fellow researchers, the authors present their vision of issues within the scope of the study.  The significance of presumptions as means of proof in criminal proceedings is clarified and their types which are distinguished in the doctrine of criminal procedure of continental and Anglo-American legal systems are characterized.  

PDF HTML

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Case of Phillips v. United Kingdom. Application No. 41087/98 European Court of Human Rights. (2001). Available online. In: https://rm.coe.int/09000016806ebe19

Case of Salabiaku v. France. (Soliciteud No. 10519/83). European Court of Human Rights (1988). Available online. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-57570%22]}

Graham, M. H. (2009). Burden of Proof and Presumptions in Criminal Cases. Criminal Law Bulletin, 44(16). Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1347127

Jacobson, S. L. (1987). Mandatory and Permissive Presumptions in Criminal Cases: The Morass Created by Allen. University of Miami Law Review, 42, pp. 1009-1032.

Kabore, S. M. (2017). Evidence in criminal proceedings. Nazi Boni University in Bobo. Available online. In: https://revuejuris.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/document-final.pdf

Law of Ukraine No. 4651-VI. Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. Official Web site of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, April 13, 2012. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text

Mekki, M. (s.f). Proof and truth in France, Netherlands/Belgium Days – La Prouve. Brussels: Noisy. 813-847 Available online In: https://mustaphamekki.openum.ca/files/sites/37/2015/07/60_T4_france.pdf

Mueller, C.B., Kirkpatrick, L., & Richter, L. (2018). «Presumptions» in Criminal Cases. GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2018-53. 6th ed. Wolters Kluwer. Available online. In: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3275018

Rudzkis, T., & Panomariovas, A. (2016). Legal presumptions in the context of contemporary criminal justice: Formulation of a paradigm. Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, 57(4), 462-476.

Walto?, S., & Hofma?ski, P. (2020). Criminal trial. System outline. Fifteenth edition. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer. Available online In: https://www.naukowa.pl/Ksiazki/proces-karny-zarys-systemu-1637342

Wodage, W. Y. (2014). Burdens of Proof, Presumptions and Standards of Proof in Criminal Cases. Mizan Law Review, 8(1), 252-270.