Functional and semantic field of aspectuality in different-systemic languages

Keywords: Aspectuality, functional-semantic field, grammatical category of kind, perfect kind, imperfect kind, perfect, imperfect, limit verbs.

Abstract

Comparative analysis of linguistic phenomena provides the development of the problem in two planes: semantic - how similar or different is the volume of concepts in the national language world pictures, and functional - the means offered by language to actualize the concept in speech. This study provides a detailed analysis of the functional and semantic field of aspectuality in the English and Ukrainian languages at all levels: from grammatical to syntactic. The article also considers the application of the functional-semantic field of aspectuality as a tool for comparative study of multisystemic as to identify their common and distinctive features. The goal of the article was to identify and compare ways of transferring Aspectuality and their main regularities in Ukrainian and English. For this purpose, the phenomenon of Aspectuality in Ukrainian and English was compared from the position of modern aspectological views.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Aliyeva Gulchohra Babali, Azerbaijan State Marine Academy, Baku, Azerbaijan.

PhD in Philology Associate Professor Head of the Department of English Language Azerbaijan State Marine Academy, Baku, Azerbaijan.

References

Bączkiewicz, A., Kizielewicz, B., Shekhovtsov, A., Yelmikheiev, M., Kozlov, V., & Sałabun, W. (2021). Comparative analysis of solar panels with determination of local significance levels of criteria using the MCDM methods resistant to the rank reversal phenomenon. Energies, 14(18), 5727. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14185727

Britsyn, V., Sukalenko, T., Ladyniak, N., Kaleniuk, S., & Zhelyazkova, V. (2021). Modern tendencies of development of norms of Ukrainian language. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S4), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5ns4.1653

Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge university press.

Derdzakyan, H. A. (2021). Functional category of aspectuality in the Russian and English languages. RUDN Journal of Language Studies Semiotics and Semantics, 12(1), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2021-12-1-41-60

Dietrich, R., Klein, W., & Noyau, C. (1995). The Acquisition of Temporality in a Second Language (Studies in Bilingualism). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Kruty, K., Chorna, H., Samsonova, O., Kurinna, A., Sorochynska, O., & Desnova, I. (2022). Genesis of grammatical structure of a preschool child language. Romanian Journal for Multidimensional Education [Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala], 14(1Sup1), 495–528. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/14.1sup1/563

Kuzmina, J., University of Latvia., Vinčela, Z., & University of Latvia. (2021). Technology-enhanced course in English theoretical grammar and phonetics at tertiary level. Baltic Journal of English Language Literature and Culture, 11, 79–97. https://doi.org/10.22364/bjellc.11.2021.06

Kvitka-Osnov’yanenko, G. (1982). Romance and stories. Dramatic create. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka http://www.encyclopediaofukraine.com/display.asp?linkpath=pages%5CK%5CV%5CKvitka6OsnovianenkoHryhorii.htm

Lykhosherstova, M. (2018, May 11). Sentence as Important Component of Functional-Semantic Field of Temporality in the Ukrainian and Arabic Languages. Scientific Journal of National Pedagogical Dragomanov University. Series 9. Current Trends in Language Development, 15, 163-171. Retrieved from https://sjnpu.com.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/88

Lyons, J., & John, L. (1995). Linguistic semantics: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Melnyk, N. I., Bogush, A. M., Vertuhina, V. M., Trofaila, N. D., & Rohalska, N. V. (2021). Comparative research in the field of professional education of preschool teachers: comparative content analysis as a method of authentic interpretation of concepts. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S2), 231–245. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5ns2.1342

Panov, V. (2021). Untangling the functions of aspectual distinctions in the Lithuanian imperative against the background of Slavonic. Baltic Linguistics, 12(1), 295-321. https://doi.org/10.32798/bl.926

Pérez-Sabater, C. (2021). Moments of sharing, language style and resources for solidarity on social media: A comparative analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 180, 266–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.034

Radyuk, A. V., & Kozubenko, A. V. (2021). Semantic classification of phraseological verbs in publicistic discourse of economic orientation. Revista Amazonia Investiga, 10(37), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.34069/ai/2021.37.01.11

Smith, C. (1997). The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Van Voorst, J. (1988). Event structure (Vol. 59). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

Xiao, R., & McEnery, T. (2004). Aspect in Mandarin Chinese: A corpus-based study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. https://www.academia.edu/19701300/Richard_Xiao_Tony_Mc_Enery_Aspect_In_Mandarin_Ch_Book_Fi_org
Published
2022-07-04
How to Cite
Babali, A. G. (2022). Functional and semantic field of aspectuality in different-systemic languages. Amazonia Investiga, 11(53), 166-175. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2022.53.05.16
Section
Articles
Bookmark and Share