The phenomenon of connotation in the comparative aspect (on the material of English and Ukrainian languages): problems of modern research
Abstract
Given that connotative components cause the appearance of new lexical-semantic variants in the token's semantic field and create opportunities for metaphorical, metonymic, ironic nomination, it is essential to analyze the phenomenon of conotema, which is present in phraseological and paremiological units of language, slang, and occasionalisms. The work aims to study the phenomenon of connotation in a comparative aspect, through the prism of English and Ukrainian languages, as well as to identify key issues of modern research of this phenomenon. The object of research is the connotation in the comparative aspect. The following methods were used during the research: analysis and synthesis, observation, method of definitive analysis, method of linguistic description of linguistic facts, comparative method. As a result of the research, the phenomenon of connotation in the comparative aspect is analyzed, based on the materials of the Ukrainian and English languages, and also the problematic aspects of the interlanguage comparison are singled out. It was also noted that it is crucial to promote a more in-depth study of connotations in psycholinguistics, sociolinguistics, ethnopsychology, linguoculturology, as this approach provides an opportunity to improve the methodology of research of connotations in the lexicological field.
Downloads
References
Hashibayazova, O.V. (2019). The concept of connotation in the linguistic dimension. [File PDF] Recovered from http://eprints.cdu.edu.ua/4476/1/mv_2019_27_10.pdf
Hrymalyuk, А.М. (2020). Explicit and implicit expression of connotation in integral idioms with colored cultural symbols (based on journalistic texts of the German-language press). Scientific notes of TNU named after VI Vernadsky. Series: Philology. Social communications, 4, 27-32. Recovered from http://www.philol.vernadskyjournals.in.ua/journals/2020/4_2020/part_2/7.pdf
Ishchenko, N.G. (2010). Evaluative component of the lexical meaning of a word. Philological treatises, 3, 47–50. Recovered from https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/9098
Kudyba, S. (2004). Specifics of terms in advertising text. Lviv: Liga-Press. Recovered from http://tc.terminology.lp.edu.ua/TK_Zbirnyk_2004/TK_Zbirnyk_2004_A_kudyba.htm
Kunin, A.V. (1986). Course of phraseology of modern English. Moscow: Higher School. [In Russian]
Marchuk, O.V. (2015). Connotative space of the world of English fantasy. Scientific Bulletin of the International Humanities University, 19, 12-19. Recovered from https://scholar.google.com.ua/citations?user=OueGOscAAAAJ&hl=uk
Maslova, V. A. (2001). Cultural Linguistics. Moscow: Academy. Recovered from https://www.gumer.info/bibliotek_Buks/Linguist/maslova/index.php
Matsko, L.I. (2003). Stylistics of the Ukrainian language. Moscow: Higher School. Recovered from http://litmisto.org.ua/?page_id=7116
Mikhailovich, O.P. (2015). Formation of the connotation of foreign language in advertising texts as an effective manipulative technique. Scientific Papers, 1(50), 272-277. Recovered from http://nz.uad.lviv.ua/static/media/1-50/34.pdf
Mozovaya, I. N. (2010). On the informativeness of a foreign word in the context of an advertising message. Semantics and pragmatics of language units in synchrony and diachrony. Simferopol: Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. [In Ukranian]
Nahapetova, О.В. (2015). Theoretical studies of connotation in modern linguistics. History of Language. Lexicology. Word Form. Cognitive Linguistics, 21, 14-19. Recovered from http://zum.onu.edu.ua/article/view/129945
Phil, G. (2012). National-cultural connotation of phraseological units of the Ukrainian language. Modern Ukraine, 1, 267-271. Recovered from https://dspu.edu.ua/native_word/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/2012-36.pdf
Telia, V.N. (1996). Russian phraseology. Moscow: School. Recovered from https://www.twirpx.com/file/262905/
Ukrainets, L. (2013) Connotation as a linguistic category: general characteristics and problems and interpretations. Linguistics, 1, 71-78. Recovered from http://dspace.pnpu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/3549/1/Ukrainec.pdf
Uzhchenko, V.D. (2007). Phraseology of the modern Ukrainian language. Kyiv: Znannia. Recovered from http://librarium.freehostia.com/suspil/mova/10/frazeologiya-suchasnoi-ukrainskoi-movi-ujchenko.html
Vynnychenko, S. (2005). Connotation as a component of meaning (on the material of Ukrainian, Polish and English phraseological units with the component water). Problems of Slavic Science, 55, 197-211. Recovered from http://old.franko.lviv.ua/slavistyka/n55/017.pdf
Zagnitko, A.P. (2012). Dictionary of modern linguistics. Donetsk: DonNU. Recovered from https://r.donnu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/248/1/словник%20сучасної%20лінгвістики%20-%201%20ОСТ%2B%2B.pdf
Zaichenko, Yu.O. (2019). Connotation as a linguistic phenomenon: definition, typology, properties and structure. Science and Education a New Dimension. Philology, VII (61), 81-85. Recovered from https://scholar.google.ru/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=ru&user=EkUPXOsAAAAJ&citation_for_view=EkUPXOsAAAAJ:LkGwnXOMwfcC
.gif)
