Ensuring the detection of property in the institute of property seizure
Keywords:
investigator, prosecutor, search, seizure, temporary access to property and documents.
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of certain issues of property detection in the institution of seizure of property. On the basis of comparative legal analysis, the possibility of ensuring the detection of property using search and seizure within the Criminal Procedure Code of the past and modern Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine and foreign countries was assessed. The rights of the victim under the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms are analyzed in terms of his/her right to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law to decide his/her civil rights and obligations. The application of the criminal procedural legislation of Ukraine is analyzed taking into account the practice of the European Court of Human Rights on the protection of human rights in relation to the rights of individuals or legal entities to peacefully own their property. Emphasis is placed on the fact that the previous provisions do not in any way restrict the right of the state to enact such laws as it deems necessary to exercise control over the use of property in accordance with the general interest. Scientific methods such as analysis, synthesis, formal-legal and comparative-legal method became the methodological basis of the research.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Azerbaijan Soviet Socialist Republic (1971). Code of Criminal Procedure of the Azerbaijan Soviet Socialist Republic. Baku: Azerbaijan state publishing house. Recovered from https://books.google.com.ua/books/about/%D0%A3%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%BB%
D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%BE_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%86%D0%B5%
D1%81%D1%81%D1%83%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8C.html?id=XRxhzQEACAAJ&redir_esc=y
Belkin, R.S. (2001). Forensics. Moscow: NORMA.
Blahuta, R.I., Sybirna, R.I., & Baraniak V.M. (2012). Kryminalistyka. Kyiv: Atika.
Bozhiev, V.P. (Ed.). (1990). Soviet criminal process. Moscow: Juridical Literature.
Central Committee of the Communist Party of Georgia. (1961). Criminal Procedure Code of the Georgian SSR. Tbilisi: publishing house of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Georgia. Recovered from http://lawlibrary.ru/izdanie3005.html
Code of Criminal Procedure of the Armenian Soviet Socialist Republic. (1971). Erevan: Aiastan. Recovered from https://www.legislationline.org/download/id/4261/file/Armenia_CPC_am2006_ru.pdf
Code of Criminal Procedure of the Latvian Soviet Socialist Republic. (1961). Riga: Latvian state publishing house.
Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Estonia. (2003). Recovered from https://www.legislationline.org/download/id/6462/file/Estonia_CC_as_of_2002_ru.pdf
Criminal Procedure Code of the Kazakh SSR. (1969). Alma-Ata: Publishing house "Kazakhstan". Recovered from https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/K590001000_
Drozd, A.V. (2019). Ensuring the inviolability of property rights in criminal proceedings: author's (ref. dis. ... cand. jurid. Science). Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, Kharkiv, 24 p. Recovered from http://dspace.univd.edu.ua/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/5881/aref_Drozd%20A%20V_2019.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
European Court of Human Rights. (2009). Judgment No. 13223/05 of June 28, 2009, in the case of Zhushman v. Ukraine. Recovered from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/docx/?library=ECHR&id=001-92774&filename=CASE%20OF%20ZHUSHMAN%20v.%20UKRAINE.docx&logEvent=False
Hlovyuk, I.V. (2016). The prosecution as a subject of evidence in deciding on the seizure of property. Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva, 3, 18-25. Recovered from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vkc_2016_3_4
Hlovyuk, I.V. (2017). Some issues of seizure of property in order to preserve material evidence. Odessa: Informatsiine zabezpechennia rozsliduvannia zlochyniv. Recovered from http://dspace.onua.edu.ua/handle/11300/9402.
Kutskir, H.M. (2015). The principle of inviolability of property rights: the concept, content and implementation in criminal proceedings. Odessa: Phoenix. Recovered from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/50594997.pdf
Law No. 2533, On Amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine, June 21, 1996. Recovered from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2533-14?find=1&text=177#w1_3
Law No. 254к/96-VR, Constitution of Ukraine. Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine, June 28, 1996. Recovered from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text
Law No. 29.12.1961, the Criminal Procedure Code of the Byelorussian SSR. Byelorussian SSR, December 29, 1961. Recovered from https://pravo.by/ImgPravo/pdf/UPK_BSSR_1960.pdf
Law No. 3275, the Code of Criminal Procedure of the RSFSR Russian. Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (RSFSR), October 27, 1960. Recovered from http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_3275/
Law No. 4651-VI, Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine, April 13, 2012. Recovered from http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17
Law of Ukraine № 1001-05, Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine of December 28, 1960 Date of renovation: 19.11.2012. Recovered from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1001-05#Text (date of application: 16.06.2021). [in Ukrainian].
Lepei, M.V. (2017). Seizure of property in criminal proceedings. Kyiv: Istina. Recovered from http://elar.naiau.kiev.ua/bitstream/123456789/1527/1/lepej_avtoref.pdf
Lithuania (1972). Criminal Procedure Code of the Lithuanian SSR. Lithuania: Mintis. Recovered from https://books.google.com.ua/books/about/%D0%A3%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%BB%
D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%BE_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%86%D0%B5%
D1%81%D1%81%D1%83%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8C.html?id=McI0AQAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y
Ministry of Internal Affairs of the USSR. (1984). Investigative actions (procedural characteristics, tactical and psychological features). Moscow: Norma.
Muzychenko, O.V. (2016). Implementation of the constitutional principle of inviolability of property rights at the stage of pre-trial investigation. Dnipro: Pravo. Recovered from https://dduvs.in.ua/wp-content/uploads/files/Structure/science/rada/auto/11/4.pdf
Rudenko, A.E. (2015). Measures to ensure criminal proceedings, restricting the property rights of the suspect, accused and other persons. Kyiv: Istina. Recovered from http://elar.naiau.kiev.ua/bitstream/123456789/1400/1/rudenko_avtoref.pdf
Smokov, S.M., & Lisnichenko, D.V. (2014). Temporary seizure of property: practice and problems of application. Pivdennoukrainskyi pravnychyi chasopys, 1, 148-152. Recovered from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Pupch_2014_1_48
Tatarov, O. (2013). The application of some provisions of the new CPC of Ukraine needs to be standardized. Mytna sprava, 4(2), 182-187. Recovered from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Ms_2013_4%282%29__34
United Nations. (1950). Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Recovered from https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_eng.pdf
United Nations. (1952). Protocol (№ 1) to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Recovered from https://rm.coe.int/168006377c
Verkhoglyad-Herasymenko, O.V. (2017). On the issue of seizing the property of third parties in criminal proceedings. Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva, 1, 20-27. Recovered from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vkc_2017_1_4
Yskandyrov, V.B. (2010). The historical aspect of the development and formation of the seizure of property as a measure of coercion in Russia. Vestnyk YuUrHU, 8, 35–39. Recovered from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/istoricheskiy-aspekt-razvitiya-i-stanovleniya-nalozheniya-aresta-na-imuschestvo-kak-mery-prinuzhdeniya-v-rossii
D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%BE_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%86%D0%B5%
D1%81%D1%81%D1%83%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8C.html?id=XRxhzQEACAAJ&redir_esc=y
Belkin, R.S. (2001). Forensics. Moscow: NORMA.
Blahuta, R.I., Sybirna, R.I., & Baraniak V.M. (2012). Kryminalistyka. Kyiv: Atika.
Bozhiev, V.P. (Ed.). (1990). Soviet criminal process. Moscow: Juridical Literature.
Central Committee of the Communist Party of Georgia. (1961). Criminal Procedure Code of the Georgian SSR. Tbilisi: publishing house of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Georgia. Recovered from http://lawlibrary.ru/izdanie3005.html
Code of Criminal Procedure of the Armenian Soviet Socialist Republic. (1971). Erevan: Aiastan. Recovered from https://www.legislationline.org/download/id/4261/file/Armenia_CPC_am2006_ru.pdf
Code of Criminal Procedure of the Latvian Soviet Socialist Republic. (1961). Riga: Latvian state publishing house.
Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Estonia. (2003). Recovered from https://www.legislationline.org/download/id/6462/file/Estonia_CC_as_of_2002_ru.pdf
Criminal Procedure Code of the Kazakh SSR. (1969). Alma-Ata: Publishing house "Kazakhstan". Recovered from https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/K590001000_
Drozd, A.V. (2019). Ensuring the inviolability of property rights in criminal proceedings: author's (ref. dis. ... cand. jurid. Science). Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, Kharkiv, 24 p. Recovered from http://dspace.univd.edu.ua/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/5881/aref_Drozd%20A%20V_2019.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
European Court of Human Rights. (2009). Judgment No. 13223/05 of June 28, 2009, in the case of Zhushman v. Ukraine. Recovered from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/docx/?library=ECHR&id=001-92774&filename=CASE%20OF%20ZHUSHMAN%20v.%20UKRAINE.docx&logEvent=False
Hlovyuk, I.V. (2016). The prosecution as a subject of evidence in deciding on the seizure of property. Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva, 3, 18-25. Recovered from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vkc_2016_3_4
Hlovyuk, I.V. (2017). Some issues of seizure of property in order to preserve material evidence. Odessa: Informatsiine zabezpechennia rozsliduvannia zlochyniv. Recovered from http://dspace.onua.edu.ua/handle/11300/9402.
Kutskir, H.M. (2015). The principle of inviolability of property rights: the concept, content and implementation in criminal proceedings. Odessa: Phoenix. Recovered from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/50594997.pdf
Law No. 2533, On Amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine, June 21, 1996. Recovered from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2533-14?find=1&text=177#w1_3
Law No. 254к/96-VR, Constitution of Ukraine. Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine, June 28, 1996. Recovered from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text
Law No. 29.12.1961, the Criminal Procedure Code of the Byelorussian SSR. Byelorussian SSR, December 29, 1961. Recovered from https://pravo.by/ImgPravo/pdf/UPK_BSSR_1960.pdf
Law No. 3275, the Code of Criminal Procedure of the RSFSR Russian. Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (RSFSR), October 27, 1960. Recovered from http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_3275/
Law No. 4651-VI, Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine, April 13, 2012. Recovered from http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17
Law of Ukraine № 1001-05, Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine of December 28, 1960 Date of renovation: 19.11.2012. Recovered from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1001-05#Text (date of application: 16.06.2021). [in Ukrainian].
Lepei, M.V. (2017). Seizure of property in criminal proceedings. Kyiv: Istina. Recovered from http://elar.naiau.kiev.ua/bitstream/123456789/1527/1/lepej_avtoref.pdf
Lithuania (1972). Criminal Procedure Code of the Lithuanian SSR. Lithuania: Mintis. Recovered from https://books.google.com.ua/books/about/%D0%A3%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%BB%
D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%BE_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%86%D0%B5%
D1%81%D1%81%D1%83%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8C.html?id=McI0AQAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y
Ministry of Internal Affairs of the USSR. (1984). Investigative actions (procedural characteristics, tactical and psychological features). Moscow: Norma.
Muzychenko, O.V. (2016). Implementation of the constitutional principle of inviolability of property rights at the stage of pre-trial investigation. Dnipro: Pravo. Recovered from https://dduvs.in.ua/wp-content/uploads/files/Structure/science/rada/auto/11/4.pdf
Rudenko, A.E. (2015). Measures to ensure criminal proceedings, restricting the property rights of the suspect, accused and other persons. Kyiv: Istina. Recovered from http://elar.naiau.kiev.ua/bitstream/123456789/1400/1/rudenko_avtoref.pdf
Smokov, S.M., & Lisnichenko, D.V. (2014). Temporary seizure of property: practice and problems of application. Pivdennoukrainskyi pravnychyi chasopys, 1, 148-152. Recovered from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Pupch_2014_1_48
Tatarov, O. (2013). The application of some provisions of the new CPC of Ukraine needs to be standardized. Mytna sprava, 4(2), 182-187. Recovered from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Ms_2013_4%282%29__34
United Nations. (1950). Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Recovered from https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_eng.pdf
United Nations. (1952). Protocol (№ 1) to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Recovered from https://rm.coe.int/168006377c
Verkhoglyad-Herasymenko, O.V. (2017). On the issue of seizing the property of third parties in criminal proceedings. Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva, 1, 20-27. Recovered from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vkc_2017_1_4
Yskandyrov, V.B. (2010). The historical aspect of the development and formation of the seizure of property as a measure of coercion in Russia. Vestnyk YuUrHU, 8, 35–39. Recovered from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/istoricheskiy-aspekt-razvitiya-i-stanovleniya-nalozheniya-aresta-na-imuschestvo-kak-mery-prinuzhdeniya-v-rossii
Published
2021-07-30
How to Cite
Bazhenova, A., Desyatnik, A., Mudretska, H., & Rakipova, I. (2021). Ensuring the detection of property in the institute of property seizure. Amazonia Investiga, 10(42), 236-247. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.42.06.22
Issue
Section
Articles
.gif)
