The Evolution of Studies on Limited Real Rights in Relation to Property in Roman Law (Republican, Classical and Imperial Period)

  • Aleksandr Aleksandrovich Biryukov North-Caucasus Federal University, Pushkina Street, Stavropol, Russia
  • Pavel Vladimirovich Razumov North-Caucasus Federal University, Pushkina Street, Stavropol, Russia
  • Viktor Viktorovich Nadein North-Caucasus Federal University, Pushkina Street, Stavropol, Russia
  • Marina Aleksandrovna Melnichuk North-Caucasus Federal University, Pushkina Street, Stavropol, Russia
  • Elena Nikolaevna Barkova North-Caucasus Federal University, Pushkina Street, Stavropol, Russia
Keywords: Real rights, property, servitude, superficies, emphyteusis, usufruct.

Abstract

The article examines the formation and development of studies on limited rights to another's property (rights to things belonging to other people) in ancient Roman law. The authors of the article analyze the Russian and foreign doctrines, as well as the legal heritage of ancient (archaic) law, the Institutiones and Digests, which partially contain works of classical Roman lawyers of the republican period, the principality era and the late Roman Empire surviving to this day. The authors discuss the formation of scientific theories justifying the construction of limited real rights to property. The article emphasizes that limited real rights in Roman law developed together with such complex socio-economic processes as the formation of small and large landed property and urbanization. Theories on limited real rights to property were influenced by civil law and praetorian law that had been forming as separate systems for a long time but then were unified. The scientific novelty of this article consists in the fact that the authors tried highlighting elements of the scientific theory developed by republican and classical lawyers and addressing such an important part of civil law as limited real rights to property. The authors proved the scientific relevance of books on civil law, whose fragments have survived to the present day and whose content can be analyzed in conformity with Justinian's codification. In this regard, they emphasized that Roman lawyers worked on such scientific issues as the content of limited real rights to property, ways of their formation, termination and protection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Aleksandr Aleksandrovich Biryukov, North-Caucasus Federal University, Pushkina Street, Stavropol, Russia

 North-Caucasus Federal University, Pushkina Street, Stavropol, Russia  

Pavel Vladimirovich Razumov, North-Caucasus Federal University, Pushkina Street, Stavropol, Russia

 North-Caucasus Federal University, Pushkina Street, Stavropol, Russia  

Viktor Viktorovich Nadein, North-Caucasus Federal University, Pushkina Street, Stavropol, Russia

 North-Caucasus Federal University, Pushkina Street, Stavropol, Russia  

Marina Aleksandrovna Melnichuk, North-Caucasus Federal University, Pushkina Street, Stavropol, Russia

 North-Caucasus Federal University, Pushkina Street, Stavropol, Russia  

Elena Nikolaevna Barkova, North-Caucasus Federal University, Pushkina Street, Stavropol, Russia

 North-Caucasus Federal University, Pushkina Street, Stavropol, Russia  

References

Bannon, C.J. (2009). Garden and neighbors: private water rights in Roman Italy. The University of Michigan Press.

Buckland, W.W. (1963). A Textbook of Roman law from Augustus to Justinian. Cambridge University Press.

Dernburg, H. (1912). Pandekty [Pandectae]. Volume 1. "Veshchnoe pravo". Saint Petersburg.

Diosdi, G. (1970). Ownership in ancient and preclassical Roman law. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.

Dorn, L. (1871). Ob uzufrukte po rimskomu pravu [On the right of usufructuary in Roman law]. Volume 1. Saint Petersburg: Tipografiya Imperatorskoi akademii nauk.

Gaius Terentius Varrō. (1963). Selskoe khozyaistvo [Agriculture]. Moscow: Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences.

Greaves, I.M. (1899). Ocherki iz istorii rimskogo zemlevladeniya [Essays from the history of the Roman agriculture]. Volume 1. Saint Petersburg: M.M. Stasyulevich Typography.

Krasnokutskii, V.A., Novitskii, I.B., Pereterskii, I.S., etc.; Novitskii, I.B. & Pereterskii, I.S. (Eds.). (2010). Rimskoe chastnoe pravo [Roman private law]. Moscow: Publisher Yurayt.

Kuzishchina, V.I. (Ed.). (1994). Istoriya drevnego Rima [The history of the Ancient Rome]. The 3rd revised and enlarged edition. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola.

Marcus Porcius Cato (2008). Zemledelie [De Agri Cultura]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka.

Medvedev, S.N., Melnikova, M.P., Bichko, M.A., Ivahnenko, S.V., & Schegolkov, V.A. (2016). Possession: Historical and Legal Study in light of RF Civil Code Improvement. Man in India, 96(10), 4119-4127.

Muromtsev, S.A. (1883). Grazhdanskoe pravo drevnego Rima [The civil law of the Ancient Rome]. Moscow: Typography A.I. Mamontov and K.

Novitskii, I.B. (2000). Rimskoe pravo [Roman law]. Moscow: Jurisprudence.

Pokrovskii, I.A. (1907). Lektsii po istorii rimskogo prava [Lectures on the history of Roman law]. Saint Petersburg.

Pukhta, G.F. (1874). Kurs rimskogo grazhdanskogo prava [Course of Roman civil law]. Volume 1. Moscow: Edition F.N. Plevaco.

Ramsay, W. (1863). A manual of Roman Antiquities. London: Griffin and Co.

Sukhanov, E.A. (2017). Veshchnoe pravo: nauchno-poznavatelnyi ocherk [Real rights: scientific and educational essay]. Moscow: Statut.
Published
2019-08-31
How to Cite
Biryukov, A., Razumov, P., Nadein, V., Melnichuk, M., & Barkova, E. (2019). The Evolution of Studies on Limited Real Rights in Relation to Property in Roman Law (Republican, Classical and Imperial Period). Amazonia Investiga, 8(21), 721-730. Retrieved from https://www.amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/161
Section
Articles
Bookmark and Share