Eurasian Economic Union in the context of sanctions policy
Keywords:
EAEU, economy, Eurasian space, globalization, Kazakhstan, national interests, post-Soviet states, protectionism, protective measures, regional integration, Russia, sanctions.
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of sanctions policy in relation to the leading economies of the countries of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). We note the main risks and threats to the national economies of the countries of this union in the context of challenges in the sphere of economic policy. The application of possible protective collective measures by the EAEU countries in response to sanctions is assessed. There is an important role of the EAEU in the development of national economies, in the convergence of economies and management systems of the members.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Alpysbaeva S.N., Kenzhebulat M.K., Akmoldina B.N., Beisengazin K.S., Tautenov E.I. (2018). Impact of the Russian economy on macroeconomic indicators of Kazakhstan. Greater Eurasia: development, security, cooperation, Yearbook of INION RAS, 1(1), 16-19.
Bogaturov A.D., Kosolapov N.A., Khrustalev M.A. (2002). Essays on the theory and political analysis of international relations. NOFMO. Мoscow.
Chichkin A. (2018). There is a complaint, but are there victims in the EAEU from the anti-Russian sanctions in addition to Russian Federation? Rhythm of Eurasia.
Cohen A. (2000). USA, Central Asia and Caucasus: problems and prospects of relations. Central Asia and Caucasus, 8, 29-45.
Kramer H. (1996). Will Central Asia become Turkey’s Sphere of Influence? Perceptions, Journal of International Affairs, 1(1).
Luzyanin S.G. (2007). Vladimir Putin's Eastern policy: Russia's return to the "Big East" (2004-2008). AST. Moscow.
Mankoff J. (2013). United States and Central Asia after 2014. Center for Strategic and International Studies. Washington.
Olcott M.B. (1996). Central Asia's New States: Independence, Foreign Policy and Regional Security. United States Institute of Peace Press, 72 (4), 862-863.
Shishkov Yu.V. (2001). Integration processes at the threshold of the XXI century. Why CIS countries are not integrated. 3 Tysyachiletie. Moscow.
Starr S., Frederick A. (2005). «Greater Central Asia Partnership» for Afghanistan and Its Neighbors. Silk Road Paper. Washington.
Statistical data of the Eurasian Economic Commission dated January 17, 2019 (2019). Moscow.
The ECE report «About application of collective measures of protection of economic interests in response to action of the third party in the international practice and possible recommendations to the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union considering their current legislation and legal framework of the Eurasian Economic Union» (2018). Moscow.
Zhao H. (2005). China, Central Asia and Shanghai Cooperation Organization. Carnegie Moscow center, Moscow.
Bogaturov A.D., Kosolapov N.A., Khrustalev M.A. (2002). Essays on the theory and political analysis of international relations. NOFMO. Мoscow.
Chichkin A. (2018). There is a complaint, but are there victims in the EAEU from the anti-Russian sanctions in addition to Russian Federation? Rhythm of Eurasia.
Cohen A. (2000). USA, Central Asia and Caucasus: problems and prospects of relations. Central Asia and Caucasus, 8, 29-45.
Kramer H. (1996). Will Central Asia become Turkey’s Sphere of Influence? Perceptions, Journal of International Affairs, 1(1).
Luzyanin S.G. (2007). Vladimir Putin's Eastern policy: Russia's return to the "Big East" (2004-2008). AST. Moscow.
Mankoff J. (2013). United States and Central Asia after 2014. Center for Strategic and International Studies. Washington.
Olcott M.B. (1996). Central Asia's New States: Independence, Foreign Policy and Regional Security. United States Institute of Peace Press, 72 (4), 862-863.
Shishkov Yu.V. (2001). Integration processes at the threshold of the XXI century. Why CIS countries are not integrated. 3 Tysyachiletie. Moscow.
Starr S., Frederick A. (2005). «Greater Central Asia Partnership» for Afghanistan and Its Neighbors. Silk Road Paper. Washington.
Statistical data of the Eurasian Economic Commission dated January 17, 2019 (2019). Moscow.
The ECE report «About application of collective measures of protection of economic interests in response to action of the third party in the international practice and possible recommendations to the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union considering their current legislation and legal framework of the Eurasian Economic Union» (2018). Moscow.
Zhao H. (2005). China, Central Asia and Shanghai Cooperation Organization. Carnegie Moscow center, Moscow.
Published
2019-08-31
How to Cite
Shamishev, E., & Toktamysov, S. (2019). Eurasian Economic Union in the context of sanctions policy. Amazonia Investiga, 8(21), 474-482. Retrieved from https://www.amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/126
Issue
Section
Articles
.gif)
