Evaluation of competitiveness, classification and calculation of customs payments of chicken breeds realized on the market

Oleg Ilyasovich Katlishin

doi:10.34069/AI/2020.27.03.43

Oleg Ilyasovich Katlishin Department of Commodity Research and Examination of Goods, Perm State Agro-Technological University named after Academician D.N. Pryanishnikov, Russia; Department of Economic Analysis and Statistics, Perm Institute, branch of REU named after G. V. Plekhanov, Russia. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2869-2312

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2020.27.03.43

Keywords: agri-food policy of the Russian Federation, development of the poultry industry, chicken breast, quality examination, competitiveness assessment.

Abstract

The development of industrial production of poultry products is a permanently relevant task for all regions of Russia, including Perm Region, since chicken meat is a daily commodity of the population because of its reasonable price and high consumer properties. However, today there is no comprehensive scientific understanding of issues related to determining the competitiveness of poultry meat products, this scientific topic requires a study of the competitiveness of chicken meat products presented on the regional market. All this determines the relevance of the study. The purpose of the scientific research in the framework of this article is to assess the competitiveness of selected samples (brands) of chicken breasts sold on Perm market. When choosing the hypothesis of scientific research, the author dwelled on the assumption of insufficient coverage of the problem of increasing and calculating the competitiveness of poultry meat products in modern science. Achieving this goal the following tasks are carried out: consideration of the theoretical foundations of the competitiveness of chicken breasts; an examination of the quality of chicken breasts sold in Perm market; conducting market research on consumer preferences and determining the competitiveness of chicken breasts by value for money and using a comprehensive integrated indicator of competitiveness. The object of the research in this article are samples of chicken breast of various brands sold on Perm market. When assessing competitiveness, the selected samples were considered according to group and economic criteria, according to the “brand awareness” indicator, point scales were used. Also, in the study of chicken breast samples, organoleptic, aesthetic indicators and other criteria for competitiveness were evaluated. For the examination of chicken breast in Perm market, the breasts of the following manufacturers were purchased: JSC “PRODO Perm Poultry Factory”, LLC “Udmurt Poultry Factory”, CJSC Uralbroiler, CJSC Petelinskaya Poultry Factory, LLC Belgrankorm-Veliky Novgorod. As a result of the research, the quality was determined and the tested samples of chicken breasts were ranked, their competitiveness was calculated from the professional objective point of view of product consulting by taking into account the quality per unit of money paid, and the real state of competitiveness in this market segment was determined taking into account consumer requests.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Oleg Ilyasovich Katlishin, Department of Commodity Research and Examination of Goods, Perm State Agro-Technological University named after Academician D.N. Pryanishnikov, Russia; Department of Economic Analysis and Statistics, Perm Institute, branch of REU named after G. V. Plekhanov, Russia.

PhD in Economics, Associate Professor of Department of Commodity Research and Examination of Goods, Perm State Agro-Technological University named after Academician D.N. Pryanishnikov, Russia; Associate Professor of Department of Economic Analysis and Statistics, Perm Institute, branch of REU named after G. V. Plekhanov, Russia.

References

Akhmetgareeva, A. A. (2016). Assessment of the competitiveness of product packaging // Modern society and power. No. 3 (9). P. 126−130.

Bessarabov, B. F., Bondarev, E. I.,. Stolyar, T. A. (2005). Poultry farming and poultry egg production technology. St. Petersburg: Doe.

Faskhiev, H. A. (2014). How to evaluate and manage the quality and competitiveness of goods and services // Marketing in Russia and abroad. No. 3. P. 88−95.

Golubkov, Ye. P. (2016). Fundamentals of marketing: a textbook. M .: Finpress.

GOST 31962-2013 “Chicken meat (carcasses of hens, chickens, broiler chickens and parts thereof) (2019). Available at:http://yandex.ru/clck/jsredir?bu=8rjt3a&from=yandex.ru

Ejeorge S., Wiemerskizch, A. (2015). Total quality management. New-York : John Wiley and Sons.

Ermolov, M. O. (2007). Competitiveness of enterprises. St. Petersburg: Business Press.

Kolobanova, E. V., Semyanova, A. V. (2016). Ways to increase the competitiveness of goods // New Science: Experience, Traditions, Innovations. No. 12-1 (119). P. 169−170.

Lall, S. (2001). Competitiveness indices and developing countries: an economic evalua-tion of the global competitiveness report// World development. V.29. No. 9. P. 1501−1525.

Mazilkina, E. I., Panichkina, G. G. (2009). Competitiveness management: a training man-ual. 3rd ed., Erased. Moscow: Omega-L.

Raikova, E. Yu. (2015). Theoretical Foundations of Commodity Science and Expertise: a Textbook for Bachelors. Moscow: Dashkov and K.

Smith, A. (1993). Research on the nature and causes of the wealth of peoples. Petroza-vodsk: Petrocom.

Stebeneva, E. A., Kashirina, N. A. (2015). Competitiveness of poultry meat sold in com-mercial network of the city of Voronezh// Bulletin of Voronezh State Agrarian University. No. 2 (45). P. 40−45.

Tereshkin, V. E. (2012). Methods for determining competitiveness // Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod State Agricultural Academy. No. 2. P. 261−264.

The review of the market of meat and meat products as of 04.10.2019. (2020). Available at: http://yandex.ru/clck/jsredir?bu=9ka048&from=yandex.ru

Tikhonova, O. Yu., Reznichenko, I. Yu., Poznyakovsky, V. M. (2014). The practical ap-plication of the algorithm for assessing the competitiveness of food labeling // Commodity expert on food products. No. 3. P. 61−67.