Social Character: Issues of Methodology and Research Methods
Abstract
This article analyzes the methodological issues of the study of the phenomenon of social character. Social character is considered not as a typical (modal) individual character in society. As a systemic formation of social interactions, social character has non-additive (emergent) properties. Both individuals and various social communities are subjects of social character. At the individual level, social character is manifested as typical behavior traits in the process of communicating with different social groups. At the level of interpersonal, intergroup and mass communication, social character is a typical form of social interaction. Social character is the result of the mutual influence of subjects on individual behavior in the form of persuasion, suggestion, imitation and infection.
The article analyzes the methods of measuring social character. It presents a test developed by one of the authors (R. B Shaikhislamov) to measure the degree of inner-, tradition- and other-directedness (according to D. Riesman’ stypology). The results of the measurement of social character in the course of interviewing residents of the Republic of Bashkortostan in 2015-2016 are presented.
The authors come to the conclusion about the need for a comprehensive study of social character. The following problems are of great scientific interest. What are the emergent properties of social character in stable and unstable social situations? What are the trends of changes in the social character of Russians in the post-Soviet era? How significant are the differences in the social character of different generations, ethnic groups, residents of megacities, other cities and villages?
We note that it is necessary to develop a system of indicators to measure social character. In addition to such indicators as inner-, tradition- and other-directedness, it is necessary to measure social character by such variables as "dominance – subordination", "productivity – non-productivity", "responsibility – irresponsibility", "cooperation – isolation", "trust – distrust", "Conformity – Innovation – Ritualism – Retreatism – Rebellion".
Downloads
References
Fromm, E. (2004). Escape from freedom, Man for himself. Moscow: AST, 571.
Fromm, E. (2011). The sane society. Moscow: AST, Astrel, 315.
Gadzhigasanova, N.S., Khairullina, N.G., Mechrischvili, L.L., Tkascheva, N.A. (2016). Specifics of ethnic Tolerance in small social groups. Global Media Journal, S3, 18-28.
Inkeles, A. (2000). Measuring Social Capital and Its Consequences. Science Policy, 33(3/4), 245-268.
Inkeles, A. (2005). National character. Retrieved from: http://national-mentalities.ru/history/istoriya/inkels_a_nacionalnyj_harakter3/
Ivanova, T.N., Abrukova M.A. (2016). Social nature of personality in modern conditions. Scientific-methodical electronic journal "Concept", 38, 75-79. Retrieved from: http://e-koncept.ru/2016/56877.htm
Khairullina, N.G., Sadykova, H.N., Ustinova, O.V., Gadzhigasanova, N.S., Tretyakova, O.V. (2016). A Study of Ethnic, Religious and social-political Relations in provincial Town. European Journal of Science and Theology, 12(4), 97-110.
Maccoby, M. (2002). Toward a Science of Social Character. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 11, 33-44.
Merton, R.K. (1992). Social structure and anomie. Sociological studies, 3, 4.
Riesman, D. (1993). Some types of character and society. Sociological research, 3, 5.
Shaikhislamov, R.B. (2005). Socio-cultural system and personality (theoretical and methodological analysis). Moscow: Social and humanitarian knowledge, 176.
Shaikhislamov, R.B. (2005). Sociology: textbook. Ufa, 310.
Sikorsky, B.F. (2002). National and social character in the life of society and man: St. Moscow, “Philosophy inform. Civilizations”, 83.
.gif)
