Authentication of Composites in Different Structural Languages

Marzhan U. Suleybanova; Mаrifa M. Sultygova; Zulfira H. Kieva; Lyudmila M. Dudarova; Marziyat M. Bidanok

doi:10.34069/AI/2020.26.02.46

Marzhan U. Suleybanova Russian Language Department, Chechen State University
Mаrifa M. Sultygova Department of Teaching and elementary education methods of the Ingush State University.
Zulfira H. Kieva Department of Teaching and elementary teaching methods of the Ingush State University; Ingush Language Department of the Ingush Scientific and Research Institute for Human Sciences named after Ch.E. Akhriev.
Lyudmila M. Dudarova Russian language department of the Ingush State University.
Marziyat M. Bidanok Adygeya Republican Institute of humanitarian studies named after T. M. Kerashev.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2020.26.02.46

Keywords: Compound words, free syntactic combinations, the problem of delimitation, phraseological units.

Abstract

At first glance, the problem of distinguishing complex words from similar free syntactic combinations does not exist.

But compound words are a reflection of "the diversity of linguistic activity." Therefore, one or more features sometimes is not enough to establish the identity of a compound word. And sometimes this is simply impossible, as some units correspond to all signs, while others do not.

There are other units in the language, consisting of two or more words and outwardly similar to complex words. Sometimes it is very difficult to distinguish complex words from outwardly similar syntactic combinations and phraseological units.

It is natural that you need to draw a line between complex words and free combinations, because if we take all units of two or more words that designate one concept (with varying degrees of semantic integrity) as complex, we will make a huge confusion in definition of complex words and phrases.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Marzhan U. Suleybanova, Russian Language Department, Chechen State University

Doctor of Philology, Professor of the Russian Language Department, Chechen State University

Mаrifa M. Sultygova, Department of Teaching and elementary education methods of the Ingush State University.

Doctor of philological sciences, professor, head of the Department of Teaching and elementary education methods of the Ingush State University.

Zulfira H. Kieva, Department of Teaching and elementary teaching methods of the Ingush State University; Ingush Language Department of the Ingush Scientific and Research Institute for Human Sciences named after Ch.E. Akhriev.

Doctor of philological sciences, associate professor of the Department of Teaching and elementary teaching methods of the Ingush State University; Head of the Ingush Language Department of the Ingush Scientific and Research Institute for Human Sciences named after Ch.E. Akhriev.

Lyudmila M. Dudarova, Russian language department of the Ingush State University.

Candidate of philological sciences, professor, head of the Russian language department of the Ingush State University.

Marziyat M. Bidanok, Adygeya Republican Institute of humanitarian studies named after T. M. Kerashev.

Doctor of Philology, Deputy Director for Science Adygeya Republican Institute of humanitarian studies named after T. M. Kerashev.

References

Akhmanova O.S. (1954) To the question of the difference between compound words and phraseological units (based on English and Swedish). Proceedings of the Institute of Linguistics of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, V. 4. P. 50-73.

Arnold I.V. (1959) Lexicology of modern English. Moscow: Publishing house of literature in foreign languages, 1959. 352 p.

Bobrik G.A. (1971) To the definition of the signs of a compound word. Philological collection Issue 10. - Alma-Ata, P.88-93.

Boziev, A.Yu. (1965) Word formation of nouns, adjectives and adverbs in the Karachay-Balkar language. Nalchik: Kabardino-Balkarks book publishing house, 88 p.

Chokaev K.Z. (1963) Morphology of the Chechen language. Word formation of parts of speech. Part I. -Grozny, 120 p.

Ganiev F.A. (1982) The formation of complex words in the Tatar language. Moscow: Nauka, 150 p.

Halperin, I.R. and Cherkasskaya, E.B. (1956) Lexicology of the English language. Publishing House: Moscow: State Central Courses of Foreign Languages "IN-YAZ", 298 pp.

Ivanova, V.F. (1977) Principles of Russian Spelling. Leningrad: Publishing House of LGU, 230 p.

Mamatov, N. (1976) About the classification of complex words in the Uzbek language. Council, Turkology, No. 4. P. 38-45.

Marchand H. (1960) Substantive bahuvrihi compound of the anthroposemic field in English.

Meshkov, O.D. (1976) Word formation of modern English. Moscow: Nauka, 245 p.

Sadvakasov G.S. (1956) Word formation of nouns in the modern Uyghur language: PhD thesis. Ata, 16 p.

Sadykova A.G. (2002) The system of substantive word composition in Turkic and Germanic languages in a comparative typological aspect. PhD thesis. Kazan, 492 p.,

Sadykova, A. G. (1992) Comparative and typological study of nominal composites in different system languages (based on the material of the Tatar and English languages): abstract. dis. ... Cand. Philol. Sciences / A. G. Sadykova.- Kazan, 19 p.

Shcherba L. V. (1945) "The next problems of linguistics. Izvestia of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Vol. 4, vol.5.- Moscow.

Semenova, G.I. (2002) To the interpretation of the interaction of word composition and affixation as the main ways of word formation. Actual problems of the Chuvash language. Cheboksary,.P. 27-29.

Smirnitsky A. I. (1952) On the Question of the Word (The Problem of "Separation of the Word"). Questions of the theory and history of language. Moscow: Nauka, P. 184-187.

Suleibanova, M.U. (2008) Nominal and verbal composites in Nakh and foreign structural languages. Grozny. -165p.