Tools for Assessing the Role of Regional Authorities in the Development of Municipalities

  • Venera Maratovna Timiryanova Department of Macroeconomic Development and Public Administration, Institute of Economics, Finance and Business of Bashkir State University, Russian Federation.
  • Kasim Nazifovich Yusupov Department of Macroeconomic Development and Public Administration, Institute of Economics, Finance and Business of Bashkir State University, Russian Federation.
  • Azat Vazirovich Yangirov Department of Macroeconomic Development and Public Administration, Institute of Economics, Finance and Business of Bashkir State University, Institute of strategic research of Republic of Bashkortostan, Russian Federation
  • Irina Aleksandrovna Lakman Department of Macroeconomic Development and Public Administration, Institute of Economics, Finance and Business of Bashkir State University, Ufa State Aviation Technical University, Russian Federation
Keywords: Multi-level governance, regional economy, geographic variance, hierarchy of administration, production output, municipalities

Abstract

The aim of the study is to identify tools to assess the role of regional authorities in the development of municipalities. Methods. The paper analyzes the influence of federal, regional, and municipal levels of the state government hierarchy on the formation of own-made goods shipped, own works and services performed per capita volumes. The assessment of the indicator ‘s variability in the context of hierarchy levels bases on variational analysis. The study was conducted in the context of 344 municipalities (7 regions of two federal district). The analysis showed in most regions a low influence at the level of regional authorities on the variation of municipalities ‘values. Results. In all regions, except for the Republic of Bashkortostan, there is a low influence of the regional governance level on the variation of the values of municipalities. In Bashkortostan, the contribution of the region as a whole is negative and it determines almost a third of the entire variation in the values of the development index of municipalities. In the Perm Region and Tatarstan, the effect of the region in absolute figures is significant, but given its low share (about 5% of the total variation), the total variation is determined by the municipalities themselves. Conclusions. In the context of municipal districts, there is a high variation in the value of the indicator in question. At the same time, the role of regional authorities is not always positive, which creates the need for a differentiated approach when assessing and developing regional policies. The analysis showed in most regions a low influence at the level of regional authorities on the variation of values of municipalities. Even less influence is rendered by authorities at the level of federal districts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Venera Maratovna Timiryanova, Department of Macroeconomic Development and Public Administration, Institute of Economics, Finance and Business of Bashkir State University, Russian Federation.

(Candidate of Economic Sciences, Assistant professor) Department of Macroeconomic Development and Public Administration, Institute of Economics, Finance and Business of Bashkir State University, Russian Federation.

Kasim Nazifovich Yusupov, Department of Macroeconomic Development and Public Administration, Institute of Economics, Finance and Business of Bashkir State University, Russian Federation.

(Doctor of Economics, Professor) Department of Macroeconomic Development and Public Administration, Institute of Economics, Finance and Business of Bashkir State University, Russian Federation.

Azat Vazirovich Yangirov, Department of Macroeconomic Development and Public Administration, Institute of Economics, Finance and Business of Bashkir State University, Institute of strategic research of Republic of Bashkortostan, Russian Federation

(Doctor of Economics, Professor) Department of Macroeconomic Development and Public Administration, Institute of Economics, Finance and Business of Bashkir State University, Institute of strategic research of Republic of Bashkortostan, Russian Federation

Irina Aleksandrovna Lakman, Department of Macroeconomic Development and Public Administration, Institute of Economics, Finance and Business of Bashkir State University, Ufa State Aviation Technical University, Russian Federation

(Candidate of Technical Sciences, Assistant professor). Department of Macroeconomic Development and Public Administration, Institute of Economics, Finance and Business of Bashkir State University, Ufa State Aviation Technical University, Russian Federation

References

Andrichenko, L. V. (2013). Razgranichenie polnomochiy mezhdu organami vlasti razlichnykh territorial'nykh urovney: Problemy tsentralizatsii i detsentralizatsii [Division of powers between the authorities of different territorial levels: The problem of centralization and decentralization]. Voprosy Gosudarstvennogo i Munitsypal’nogo upravleniya [Public Administration Issues], 4, 37-58. Retrieved from https://vgmu.hse.ru/data/2014/10/17/1099220025/%D0%90%D0%BD%D0%B4%
D1%80%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%BE%204-2013.pdf

Ballas, D., & Tranmer, M. (2012). Happy people or happy places? A multilevel modeling approach to the analysis of happiness and well-being. International Regional Science Review, 35(1), 70-102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017611403737.

CBR. (2016). Official foreign currency exchange rates. Retrieved from http://www.cbr.ru/currency_base/daily/?date_req=31.12.16

Chan, C. M., Makino, S. & Isobe, T. 2010. Does subnational region matter? Foreign affiliate performance in the United states and China. Strategic Management Journal, 31(11), 1226-1243. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.854

Constitution of Russia. (1993, December 12). Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/the-constitution-of-the-russian-federation-was-adopted-on-december-12-/168071d2f4

Dobrynin, N. M. (2010). Gosudarstvennoye upravleniye: Teoriya i praktika. Sovremennaya versiya istorii gosudarstva [Public administration: Theory and practice. A modern version of the newest history of the state]. Novosibirsk: Science. Retrieved from https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19827500

Garson, D. (2013). Hierarchical linear modeling: guide and applications. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384450

Geys, B., & Konrad, K. A. (2011). Federalism and optimal allocation across levels of governance. In H. Enderlein, S. Wälti, & M. Zürn (Eds.), Handbook on Multi-Level Governance (pp. 32-65). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Gibson, C. C., Williams, J. T. & Ostrom, E. (2005). Local enforcement and better forests. World Development, 33(2), 273-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.013

Goldstein, H. (2010). Multilevel statistical models (4 ed.). New York: Wiley. Retrieved from http://www.bris.ac.uk/cmm/team/hg/

Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2002). Types of multi-level governance. Les cahiers europeens de sciences po, 3, 1-31. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Liesbet_Hooghe/publication/48854082_Types_of_Multi-Level_Governance/links/0046352eb5935cef55000000/Types-of-Multi-Level-Governance.pdf

Howlett, M., Vince, J. & Río, P. (2017). Policy integration and multi-level governance: Dealing with the vertical dimension of policy mix designs. Politics and Governance, 5(2), 69-78. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i2.928

Jones, K., Johnston, R., Manley, D., Owen, D. & Charlton, C. (2015). Ethnic residential segregation: A multilevel, multigroup, multiscale approach exemplified by London in 2011. Demography, 52(6), 1995-2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-015-0430-1

Kim, R., & Subramaniana, S. V. (2016). What’s wrong with understanding Variation using a single geographic scale? A multilevel geographic assessment of life expectancy in the United States. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 36, 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2016.09.002.

Kim, R., Mohanty, S. K. & Subramanian, S. V. (2016). Multilevel geographies of poverty in India. World Development, 87, 349-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.07.001.

Lloyd, C. D. (2015). Spatial scale and small area population statistics for England and Wales. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30(6), 1187-1206. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2015.1111377

Moellering, H., & Tobler, W. (1972). Geographical Variances. Geographical Analysis, 4, 35-50.

Osipov, V. S. (2016). Proyektno-funktsional'naya struktura upravleniya dlya gosudarstvennykh organov [Project-functional management structure for government bodies]. Voprosy Gosudarstvennogo i Munitsipal'nogo Upravleniya [Issues of state and municipal governance], 3, 219-230. Retrieved from https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26716605

Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Garcilazo, E. (2015). Quality of government and the returns of investment: Examining the impact of cohesion expenditure in European кegions. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1274-1290. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1007933

Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Maslauskaite, K. (2012). Can policy make us happier? Individual characteristics, socioeconomic factors, and life satisfaction in Central and Eastern Europe. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 5, 77-96. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsr038

Rosstat. (2017). Gross regional product, 2006-2016. Moscow: Federal State Statistics Service of Russia. Retrieved from http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/accounts/#

Rosstat. (2018). Database of municipalities' indicators. Moscow: Federal State Statistics Service of Russia. Retrieved from http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/bd_munst/munst.htm

Scholten, P. (2016). Between national models and multi-level decoupling: The pursuit of multi-level governance in Dutch and UK Policies towards migrant incorporation. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 17(4), 973-994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-015-0438-9

Shashina, N. S. & Khodyrev, V. V. (2012). Sistema gosudarstvennogo i munitsypalnogo upravleniya [System of state and municipal management]. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University of Management and Economics. Retrieved from https://www.spbume.ru/file/pages/78/shashina_hodirev.pdf

Smith, A. (2007). Emerging in between: The multi-level governance of renewable energy in the English regions. Energy Policy, 35, 6266–6280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.07.023

Stein, M. & Turkewitsch, L. (2008). The Concept of Multi-level Governance in Studies of Federalism. In International Political Science: New Theoretical and Regional Perspectives Conference Proceedings (pp. 1-35). Montréal, Québec: Concordia University. Retrieved from http://paperroom.ipsa.org/papers/paper_4081.pdf

Uskova, Т. В. & Voroshilov, N. V. (2015). Regional’naya politika territorial’nogo razvitiya [Regional policy of territorial development]. Vologda: The Institute of Socio-Economic Development of Territories of RAS. Retrieved from http://library.vscc.ac.ru/Files/books/1444632852regional_naja_politika.pdf

Wei, C., Blaschke, T., Kazakopoulos, P., Taubenböck, H. & Tiede, D. (2017). Is spatial resolution critical in urbanization velocity analysis? Investigations in the Pearl River Delta. Remote Sensing, 9(1), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9010080
Published
2019-08-31
How to Cite
Timiryanova, V., Yusupov, K., Yangirov, A., & Lakman, I. (2019). Tools for Assessing the Role of Regional Authorities in the Development of Municipalities. Amazonia Investiga, 8(21), 307-320. Retrieved from https://www.amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/107
Section
Articles
Bookmark and Share