206
www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.63.03.19
How to Cite:
Tarasiuk, N., Podplota, S., Kaluzhska, L., & Osets’ka, N. (2023). The problem of the cultural crisis in today's information-digital
society. Amazonia Investiga, 12(63), 206-213. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.63.03.19
The problem of the cultural crisis in today's information-digital society
El problema de la crisis cultural en la actual sociedad digital de la información
Received: March 5, 2023 Accepted: April 20, 2023
Written by:
Liudmyla Obukh1
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3556-7587
https://www.webofscience.com/wos/author/record/2427369
Kateryna Bannikova2
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5696-1033
https://www.webofscience.com/wos/author/record/33315638
Ihor Tsurkan3
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8200-5299
https://www.webofscience.com/wos/author/record/IAQ-0384-2023
Anastasiia Khudiakova4
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3648-4401
https://www.webofscience.com/wos/author/record/IAQ-0286-2023
Stanislav Kotorobai5
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8205-4448
https://www.webofscience.com/wos/author/record/IAQ-1005-2023
Abstract
The purpose of the paper is to highlight the crisis
phenomena that are an integral part of the socio-
cultural space and, together with elements of
progress towards well-being, form civilizational
progress. The crisis of culture has several
manifestations, determining its existential and
axiological dimensions. The purpose of scientific
exploration is to characterize the crisis
phenomena in modern culture in the information
and digital section. The methodology that most
fully reveals the content of the cultural crisis is
scientific-philosophical dialectical and
synergetic in nature. Consequently, man and
society use informatization and digitalization of
socio-cultural space as principles, revealing the
problematic aspects of cultural development. The
formation of innovative sociocultural
development strategies, the main task of which is
to promptly identify the crisis aspects of culture,
should be considered as a novelty. It is the
1
Ph.D (Theory and history art), Аssociatе Professor, Head of Department of Artistic Education Educational and Research Institute
of Pedagogics, Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University, Ukraine.
2
Director of Talent Acquisition and Human Resources, (PhD). Scientific degree: Candidate Specialty: Sociological sciences, Special
and sectoral sociology, Kharkiv University of Humanities “People’s Ukrainian Academy”, Ukraine.
3
Doctor of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor Mykolaiv Branch of Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts
Event Management and Social Communications, Ukraine.
4
Graduate student, Department of Theory and History of Art, Faculty of Fine Arts, Kharkiv State Academy of Design and Fine Arts,
Ukraine.
5
Ph.D, Doctor of Philosophy, Docent, Department of Theater Organization, Faculty of Theater Arts, Kyiv National I. K.
Karpenko-Karyi University of Theatre, Ukraine.
Obukh, L., Bannikova, K., Tsurkan, I., Khudiakova, A., & Kotorobai, S. / Volume 12 - Issue 63: 206-213 / March, 2023
Volume 12 - Issue 63
/ March 2023
207
http:// www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
dynamism that is the main practically oriented
criterion in the modern scientific and
philosophical analysis of the cultural crisis.
Conclusion. Thus, the information and digital
society has developed the actual value constants
of its development, which allow promptly
recognizing the cultural processes that are
potentially or presently in crisis.
Keywords: culture, cultural crisis, information
society, digitalization, sociocultural space.
Introduction
The history of human civilization, from the
ancient world to the present day, has been
permeated by cultural crises. The last largest
crisis was associated with the industrialization of
social development. Currently, humanity is on
the threshold of a new global crisis, which will
develop and spread in the information and digital
environment.
The nature of the cultural crisis is existential in
nature. At the same time, all the socio-cultural
components, which are accompanying elements
of the crisis, form its axiological dimensions.
Informatization, digitalization, communication
are all factors of the new technological era of the
XXI century. All these aspects have axiological
orientations, defining material and spiritual
values, which are actualized in the conditions of
cultural crisis.
The crisis of culture has its own organizational
and methodological features, among which there
are two most common models (see Fig. 1).
Fig. 1. Methodological Dimensions of the Cultural Crisis
Source: authors' own development
The second half of the 20th century was a period
of rapid development of technological and
information resources. Consequently, quite a few
theories were formed, according to which
information and communication technologies
would be the civilizational factor that would lead
to the decline of civilization. However,
technological progress and the information space
continued to advance without exposing society to
planetary danger. Automation and digitalization
successfully performed their functions, helping
man in all areas of social activity. But neither
machines, nor jobs, nor artificial intelligence
create real existential threats to man or society.
Therefore, apocalyptic ideas associated with
information and communication technologies
(ICTs) have gradually receded into the
background in the worldview paradigm.
At the same time, the information and digital
society is characterized by many factors
indicative of the problems that mature in the
contemporary cultural environment. First of all,
the problematic aspects of the functioning of
ICTs in relation to the cultural component of
social or individual existence are actualized.
Material and especially spiritual culture are
•An event of civilizational scale (pandemic, world
war, natural planetary cataclysm) causes crisis
phenomena in the socio-cultural space
Inductive
•A set of minor cultural issues form global cultural
measurement fractures
Deductive
208
www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
significantly influenced by information and
technology, which leads to crisis phenomena.
Informatization and digitalization of culture have
dramatically changed the positioning of cultural
values in the public consciousness. Thanks to the
technologically improved functionality, digital
culture is more likely to win the attention of users
and connoisseurs. Digital communication
provides new and improved opportunities for the
target audience to reach the content and format of
culture without the time and place limitations
(Taşkıran, 2019). In this way, human access to
the cultural commons, which is a fundamental
constant of sociocultural progress, is being
shaped. An individual, "armed" with the
achievements of culture and having unimpeded
access to culture, can independently form his
beliefs and worldview. This becomes a reliable
pledge for the formation of a protective anti-
crisis model of worldview. Informatization and
digitalization of the socio-cultural space under
such conditions, in addition to its basic functions,
also fulfills a protective mission.
The purpose of the paper is to characterize the
development of the civilization space in the
context of individual, local and global socio-
cultural crises. The article analyzes the balance
of tradition and innovation in modern society,
which creates the preconditions for further social
progress.
Methods
Among the general scientific methods, it is
necessary to single out those that are relevant to
the culturological methodology. The systemic
method provides a general understanding of the
crisis of culture and allows the grouping the
information and digital elements into a general
cluster of problematic issues. However, the
structural-functional method allows analyzing
the content of problems, which are actualized in
the sphere of culture by informatization and
digitalization. Thanks to the semiotic method, it
is possible to interpret the format of the
expression of information and digital threats to
the socio-cultural space. The comparative-
historical method illuminates the peculiarities of
the cultural crisis through the prism of historical
experience, modeling the integration of the
information and digital component into the
cultural and historical reality.
The general scientific cultural methodology is
assisted by philosophical and synergetic
methods, which provide an understanding of the
ICT organization and its impact on cultural
processes in the modern world. The notion of
self-organization as an effective protective
response to the aggressive influence of
information and the digital environment is
actualized. Consequently, the methodology of
synergetics is in demand in the modern scientific
and cultural discourse.
Literature review
The source base on the problem of the cultural
crisis in the modern information and digital
society is divided into two fundamental clusters:
scientific works on the cultural component of
ICTs and scientific research on the relationship
of information and communication technologies
with the cultural development of society. It
should be noted that in the modern world, the
development of the information and digital
cluster has acquired an extremely rapid pace.
The issues of the positioning of information and
digital space in the socio-cultural environment
are raised in the works of Dahlgren (2018),
Fenwick, McCahery & Vermeulen (2021),
Gidlund & Sundberg (2021), Sarnavska et al.
(2021). Concretized theoretical-methodological
and practically oriented aspects of using
information and digital potential in cultural
promotion Veil & Waymer (2021), Marsen
(2020), Taşkıran (2019), Panico & Vidal (2019).
The axiological aspects of information and
digital content in the cultural dimension have
been explored by Boisnard, Tchéhouali & Rioux
(2019), Hoe (2019).
The direct impact of information,
communication, and digital technology on the
cultural development of society was highlighted
by Tian et al., (2018), Yun et al., (2020).
Innovative information and technological
components that are resources for cultural
development (as generators of crisis, catalysts of
crisis phenomenon, or fuse of crisis) are found in
scientific studies by Kiefer, van Dinther &
Spitzmüller (2021), Moussa, McMurray &
Muenjohn (2018), Ma, Zhang, Wang & Zhang
(2021).
Results
If we put aside fantastic apocalyptic scenarios in
which artificial intelligence destroys human
civilization, we can argue that the information
and digital space does not form existential risks
for general cultural development. Of course,
some moments have a negative impact of
Volume 12 - Issue 63
/ March 2023
209
http:// www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
information and the digital world on the
development of culture. However, these aspects
have rather value dimensions.
Information in the modern world has systemic
significance for the value cultural-historical
paradigm. Information resources are of different
nature and affect the cultural-creative potential in
different ways. The scale of volumes of
information and the speed of information (both
creation and transmission) determine the format
of cultural achievements. If we add the
innovation element, which provides the target
component of the information-digital
environment, we can assert the fundamentality of
these processes for culture. Hence, we obtain a
dichotomy associated with two trends, which are
formed simultaneously, but characterized by
opposite target dimensions:
Globalization of culture, which aims to bring the
value (and in the long term - and existential)
dimensions to a common denominator;
• Cultural identification, which consists in
preserving the authenticity of the cultural
component in the folk, national, regional,
religious, and professional dimensions.
• One of the key questions in this dichotomy
is the place and role of the information and
digital factor in these trends. And this is
where the main questions of our study arise:
• Do information and digital elements cause
the crisis of culture?
• Which clusters of culture are negatively
influenced by information and digital
factors?
Let us try to answer these problematic questions.
First of all, let us note that almost all moments
characteristic of the crisis of culture are
interconnected with the information or digital
dimension. However, a fair clarification arises -
does this interconnectedness mean causal
moments?
The main problem is that any manifestation of
crisis in contemporary culture will have an
information and digital accompaniment.
However, this does not indicate that ICT or
digital space is a cause or a factor of crisis
phenomena. Now we observe a stereotypical and
distorted worldview belief that the moral crisis of
modern society is a consequence of aggressive
information influence. Such a statement is only
partially true. The nature of information implies
the formation of certain beliefs and perceptions
in human beings. When we talk about the
information society, we understand not just the
nature of information, but also its
epistemological, axiological, and
methodological dimensions. It is here that the
contradiction in the relationship between ICTs
and cultural issues is understood.
A separate issue is a regulatory and normative
aspect aimed at streamlining the information and
digital environment. As Dahlgren (2018) notes,
we are witnessing a crisis in the public sphere of
the cultural dimension that threatens to explode
the political authority to control cultural
development. Democratic principles are
crumbling because of excessive populism and
distrust of information resources. If we add to
this process the emotional aspect, which comes
to life in the information and digital space, we get
a threat to the regulation of processes affecting
cultural promotion.
“The social appropriation of digital technology
can lead to an expansion of public and private
freedoms, in particular freedom of expression.
Digital control should be understood as a kind of
control for the purpose of controlling behavior.
Controlled digital use is linked to cultural
practices in the context of the social
appropriation of networked technologies
ubiquitous in society. In concerted refusal, the
structuring and semantization of data emphasize
flows controlled by economic and cultural actors
to enable access to resources” (Panico & Vidal,
2019).
The convergence between telecommunications
networks and the content they broadcast
determines the policy and regulatory framework
for the operation of the digital space (Boisnard
Tchéhouali & Rioux, 2019). Currently, there is a
trend towards the neutrality of information and
digital capacity. Thus, there is a process of
delimiting the information-digital environment
from assessments of cultural realities.
The information and digital cluster cannot be
completely limited to crisis phenomena in
culture. Theoretical-methodological and
practically-oriented models are proposed, thanks
to which information, communication,
technology, and the digital world will not
become a source and favorable environment for
the development of crisis phenomena.
In particular, the relevance of systems thinking is
quite actively discussed. This approach allows us
to see not only the consequences of the cultural
crisis on the example of individuals or
communities but also to comprehend the overall
picture of what is happening. Approaches of
210
www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
personal mastery, mental models, and teamwork
in the context of the megatrend of digitalization
are proposed (Hoe, 2019). As an example, we can
observe a separate negative manifestation of
culture, which has spread in the media or in the
digital information space. However, this does not
mean that the essence and format of the crisis
phenomenon has been shaped precisely by the
information and digital environment. However,
the broadcasting of content associated with the
crisis leads to the formation of false stereotypes
about ICTs as a factor of cultural contradictions.
Another methodological feature that points to the
need to distinguish the information and digital
space separately from the cultural content
disseminated in it is the transition from
dialectical to synergetic worldview approaches.
The only reality of personality in the virtual
space of communication is the reality of self-
presentation (Sarnavska et al., 2021). This fact
conditions the potential danger of personal
development in the information-digital
environment. This, in turn, leads to the risk of
failure to respond to cultural crises. Focusing on
the crisis of the individual, vigilance about the
crisis of socio-cultural nature is lost. Such
individualization inherent in the information and
digital environment has a negative impact on the
strategic assessment of the state of cultural
development.
Proceeding from the realities of human
positioning in the modern information and digital
society, there is an urgent need for new
worldview attitudes, relevant for the information
era of civilization development.
The synergetic model in this regard is
characterized by both the self-organization of
human potential and the systematic ordering of
the functioning of ICT. Consequently, the
discrepancy in the capabilities of the
information-digital space and the human ability
to use them in a positive dimension disappears.
Discussion
Usually, in the period of formation and
development of a cultural-historical epoch, social
crises precede crisis phenomena in culture. The
return process, when culture already provokes
negative shifts in society, is typical for the period
of disintegration or transformation of the
cultural-historical epoch. So far, it is possible to
state that the information and digital society has
just begun to establish itself in the worldview
paradigm of modern civilization. Consequently,
we can state that society is now the dominant
element in the mutual influence between social
and cultural development.
The crises of the social structure determine the
changes and transformations in the information
and digital space. Coronavirus was the first
global crisis of the digital era and created
uncertainty in all dimensions of civilizational
existence (Fenwick, McCahery & Vermeulen,
2021). Any moment of instability generates a
large number of interpretations of different
nature. Therefore, the information and digital
space is quite actively reoriented to the
interpretive model of its functioning. This forms
a negative influence on the development of the
information-digital environment itself.
New formats for positioning the information and
digital potential in the cultural promotion are
being developed in the modern world. In
particular, the moderating role of innovation
culture is being explored (Ma et al., 2021).
Moderating in this case is a methodological
principle, according to which information and the
digital world are both mechanisms for the
generation and translation of ideas, principles,
and attitudes. Consequently, the flexibility of the
worldview system is formed due to the
immediacy achieved by the means of ICT.
One of the elements that have been actualized in
the modern information and digital field is the
principle of "culture of cancellation" (Veil &
Waymer, 2021). This approach involves the use
of information and digitalization to erase the
negative manifestations of cultural activity in
society. The crisis in society generates tensions
and contradictions. ICTs are used as theoretical-
methodological and practically oriented
possibilities, through which a civilizational
picture of the world is formed. When a certain
irritant arises that predetermines a crisis
phenomenon, the information and digital
environment is activated to neutralize it in the
worldview dimension.
It is obvious that the information and digital
space cannot exist autonomously from the
realities of social development. Under such
conditions, ICTs become translators of crisis
elements that are characteristic of society.
However, this does not mean that technology or
information is the cause of the crisis. In this
context, one of the progressive variants of the
relationship between ICTs and social processes is
mediation (Þ Gunnþórsson, 2020).
Volume 12 - Issue 63
/ March 2023
211
http:// www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
In this context, information and technology play
the role of translator rather than a generator of
ideas and principles.
Science has made a successful attempt to
methodologically justify the structure and
functioning of the information and
communication space according to the needs of
society. At present, a theory of crisis
communication has been formed, which has in its
arsenal the following precepts:
• Image restoration;
• The theory of situational crisis
communication;
• Rhetorical arena theory;
• Narrative and integrated crisis structuring
(Marsen, 2020).
The practical significance lies in the organization
of the principle of crisis management. The
information and digital space is an effective tool,
through which you can respond to crisis
phenomena.
A promising direction of research in this regard
is the development of settings for information
and digital resources, which will prevent the
occurrence of crisis phenomena in culture.
Already now scientific and technological
progress offers algorithms, thanks to which
forecasting in economics, politics, and
technological development is carried out.
Consequently, risks are calculated, and
preventive measures are taken to prevent crisis
manifestations. Of course, when it comes to the
material component of social life, such
simulations have a higher reliability than in the
matter of spiritual development. However, the
information and digital space of recent decades is
gradually replacing other elements of the
spiritual formation of man. Consequently, all
prerequisites are formed to regulate the
worldview-spiritual development of society
through information and communication
resources.
It is clear that in this case, we face risks for
society. History has already repeatedly proved
that attempts to conquer the spiritual and
ideological component of society lead not just to
crises, but to real catastrophes (wars, totalitarian
regimes).
The dichotomy of the role and place of ICTs in
socio-cultural development is currently relevant.
Innovation contributes to the progress of culture,
providing new horizons and centers for the
realization of cultural dimensions. On the one
hand, the information and digital field is the
environment where culture develops and
changes. On the other hand, ICTs, with all their
popularization in recent years, are still unable to
dictate the conditions for the dominant cultural
trends of modern society. Therefore, an
interpretative model of information and digital
space in the context of the development of
modern culture is noted. When the issue of
cultural crisis is actualized, information becomes
an important tool in the dissemination and
justification of crisis narratives.
“The chosen analytical framework stretches
from technological culture (i.e., how and where
myths and symbolic narratives are constructed)
and a focus on the process of interpretation (i.e.,
flexibility in how digitalization can be translated
and tied to different political goals and values) to
the dimension of primacy (looking to education,
professional experience, and geographic
location to explore aspects of dominance and
power)” (Gidlund & Sundberg, 2021).
Currently, methodologically in relation to
innovation models, there is a division between
global, national, and organizational culture (Tian
et al, 2018). Culture in its various variations has
always been the most important driver of
innovation (Yun et al., 2020). One characteristic
aspect of cultural development is dynamism.
This process is fundamental to progress and crisis
in culture. Accordingly, the information and
digital space is a factor that ensures the dynamics
in culture. This process has both positive and
negative meaning. If the information and digital
potential is used to assert scientific and
technological progress, it is an example of a
positive influence on cultural dynamics. When
the information and digital space becomes a
platform for the dissemination of elements that
cause crisis in culture, it is a negative
manifestation of the dynamics of cultural
development.
The development of new ideas and innovations is
a primary and inevitable process. This is due to
intense global competition and rapid
technological development (Moussa et al., 2018).
Digitalization increases the pressure on culture,
forcing innovation in all areas of public life. The
following characteristics of organizational
culture are currently relevant: corporate
entrepreneurship, digital awareness, need for
innovation, digital skills and resources,
ecosystem orientation, participation and self-
organization of actors, agility and organizational
structures, the culture of error and risk-taking,
212
www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
internal knowledge sharing and collaboration,
results orientation (pragmatism), openness and
desire for progress. Note that there is a term
"digital innovation culture" in scholarly
discourse that emphasizes the importance of an
approach to digital transformation and
innovation (Kiefer et al., 2021). Consequently,
information and digital innovation becomes a
relevant mechanism in cultural crises.
A promising direction for further research is to
differentiate the role of ICTs in the cultural crises
of the modern world (see Fig. 2).
Fig. 2. Information and Digital Models in the Cultural Crisis.
Source: Own development by the authors
Consequently, informatization and digitalization
can play an active as well as a passive role in the
process of cultural development. In a cultural
crisis, ICTs can be a deterrent and an element in
overcoming it. At the same time, information and
digital resources are a source of feeding the crisis
processes.
Conclusion
Information and digital space has become
substantially entrenched in the theoretical and
attitudinal and practical commonplace paradigms
of contemporary socio-cultural space.
Consequently, all information and digital
resources have become fundamental to human
life or society. Under such conditions, ICTs are
both carriers of positive achievements in the
sphere of culture and elements causing crisis
phenomena in culture.
The cultural crisis of modern civilization has two
key dimensions, fully or indirectly related to the
information and digital space:
• the global-existential dimension,
characterizing the information-digital space
as one of the components with destructive
consequences for civilization as a whole
(artificial intelligence, dependence of
critical infrastructure on ICT);
• practically axiological dimension, reflecting
the negative impact of the information and
digital component on material and spiritual
culture (virtualization of social relations,
devaluation of moral norms).
The global-existential dimension preserves the
potential destructiveness of the socio-cultural
development of civilization, but so far these
manifestations have not been observed. Now we
can state the actualization of the axiological
dimension of the cultural crisis associated with
information and digital technologies.
Consequently, it is necessary to form value
constants which will become reference points for
the use and development of the information and
digital space. Thus, the normative function will
become practically effective and will form
protective mechanisms against the negative
influence of technologization, informatization,
and digitalization of the modern socio-cultural
space.
Bibliographic references
Boisnard, M., Tchéhouali, D., & Rioux, M.
(2019). Cultural policies 2.0: Rebuilding the
intervention of public authorities.
In Digitalization of Society and Socio‐
political Issues 1 (pp. 139–147). Wiley.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119687177.ch1
3
Dahlgren, P. (2018). Media, knowledge and
trust: The deepening epistemic crisis of
democracy. Javnost - The Public, 25(1–2),
Preventive Protective Neutral
Passive-auxiliary Active-nutrient Radical
Volume 12 - Issue 63
/ March 2023
213
http:// www.amazoniainvestiga.info ISSN 2322- 6307
20–27.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1418
819
Fenwick, M., McCahery, J. A., &
Vermeulen, E. P. M. (2021). Will the world
ever be the same after COVID-19? Two
lessons from the first global crisis of a digital
age. European Business Organization Law
Review, 22(1), 125–145.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-020-00194-9
Gidlund, K. L., & Sundberg, L. (2021).
Undisclosed creators of digitalization: A
critical analysis of representational
practices. Information Polity, 26(1), 3–20.
https://doi.org/10.3233/ip-200230
Þ. Gunnþórsson, F. (2020). Mediation: Crisis,
postmodern culture and decision
making. SSRN Electronic Journal.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3713233
Hoe, S. L. (2019). Digitalization in practice: the
fifth discipline advantage. Learning
Organization, 27(1), 54–64.
https://doi.org/10.1108/tlo-09-2019-0137
Kiefer, D., van Dinther, C., & Spitzmüller, J.
(2021). Digital innovation culture: A
systematic literature review. In Lecture Notes
in Information Systems and
Organisation (pp. 305–320). Springer
International Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86800-
0_22
Ma, L., Zhang, X., Wang, G., & Zhang, G.
(2021). How to build employees’ relationship
capital through different enterprise social
media platform use: the moderating role of
innovation culture. Internet Research, 31(5),
1823-1848. https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-01-
2020-0022
Marsen, S. (2020). Navigating crisis: The role of
communication in organizational
crisis. International Journal of Business
Communication, 57(2), 163–175.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488419882981
Moussa, M., McMurray, A., & Muenjohn, N.
(2018). Innovation in public sector
organisations. Cogent Business &
Management, 5(1), 1475047.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1475
047
Panico, R., & Vidal, G. (2019). Digital practices,
cultural practices, under surveillance.
In Digitalization of Society and Socio‐
political Issues 1 (pp. 51–59). Wiley.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119687177.ch5
Sarnavska, O., Yakovyshyna, T., Kachmar, O.,
Sherman, M., Shadiuk, T., & Koberska, T.
(2021). The influence of the culture of the
third information revolution on the formation
of personality in the M. serres philosophical
discourse. Postmodern Openings, 12(1),
241–253.
https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.1/257
Taşkıran, H. B. (2019). Digitalization of Culture
and Arts Communication: A Study on Digital
Databases and Digital Publics. In Handbook
of Research on Examining Cultural Policies
Through Digital Communication (pp. 144–
160). IGI Global.
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-6998-
5.ch007
Tian, M., Deng, P., Zhang, Y., &
Salmador, M. P. (2018). How does culture
influence innovation? A systematic literature
review. Management Decision, 56(5),
1088-1107. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-05-
2017-0462
Veil, S. R., & Waymer, D. (2021). Crisis
narrative and the paradox of erasure: Making
room for dialectic tension in a cancel
culture. Public Relations Review, 47(3),
102046.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.10204
6
Yun, J. J., Zhao, X., Jung, K., & Yigitcanlar, T.
(2020). The culture for open innovation
dynamics. Sustainability, 12(12), 5076.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125076