models, approaches, and other, considering the
characteristics of the region and the adoption of
the principle of regionalization as one of the
leading in modern education.
Phase 1 - defining the value basics of the
mechanisms for preparing students for cross-
cultural communication.
The implementation of higher education reforms
is characterized by global and local changes in
education. Among the specific features is
fundamental research on the priorities and values
of education, manifested in the activation of
regional ethnocultural and ethnopolitical
movements. They, in return, are stimulated by
the processes of globalization and integration
(Wu, & Havens, 2005). The close attention to
local differences, the importance of the formation
of cultural identity, the growing interest in the
traditions of ancient times have determined the
demand to form a single but diverse regional-
oriented network that requires maximum
consideration of ethnocultural characteristics in
the region. At the same time, it is obvious that
«the best practice is not an absolute and final
decision, the implementation of which ensures
the improvement of the work of a higher
education institution; rather, «the best practice»
means finding the best approach in a given
situation, since institutions or individual
organizational programs are very different in
their structure and scope» (Nieto et al., 2008).
Although modern education is based on the
adopted competency-based approach, the
purpose of which is the focus on the freedom of
choice for a student, the openness of education,
the new quality of education, in general, and the
mechanisms for the development of cross-
cultural communication, in particular.
Phase 2 – justifying the choice of the region
selected for comparison and analysis. The
experience of the region taken for comparison
is adapted to the conditions of the region of
application.
For a comparative study, it is also essential to
justify the choice of the higher education
institution. It is particularly necessary to study
those universities that have had many years of
positive experience in preparing students for
cross-cultural communication, have a similar
activity area (training bachelors and masters of
education), and have a regional status.
Consequently, the partnership between regional
educational institutions is vital. The result of
such partnership would be natural conditions for
studying the cross-cultural communication
development mechanisms. Another reason for
choosing a specific regional university may be
the access to information about how education is
developing there (Zhukova et al., 2022). The
main task of this stage is the search for the most
successful cases.
A precedent is an option of the system being
modeled (part of its functionality) due to which
an individual can obtain a specific, measurable,
and desired result. It corresponds to a particular
component of the system, defines one of the use
cases, and describes a typical way in which an
individual interacts with that system. Use cases
are usually employed to specify the external
requirements for the system, taking into account
the influence of sociocultural factors.
Some foreign researchers consider a precedent
(Eng. Case) as a specification of the sequences of
actions (variants of sequences and invalid
sequences) that a system, subsystem, or class can
perform when interacting with external actors.
While the precedent describes some integral
fragment of the system and the interaction of the
system with the actors, the case describes an
individual incident. In this process, the main
issue is to establish the relationship between
these concepts. As it is known, the research
strategy of a “case” is defined as an empirical
study of an individual incident. A “case” refers to
methods of “qualitative research”, which means
any type of research when obtaining results is not
achieved by quantifying and processing data
using statistics.
The choice of the research method of precedents
(Case-based Reasoning) allows, in our
understanding, to solve a new, unknown problem
by using or adapting the solution of an already
known problem. Thus, employing already
accumulated experience in solving similar
problems. Whereas, the case itself is a
description of a specific issue (Ziegele, 2006).
The current understanding of the precedent
method enables to determine the possibility of
using the accumulated experience repeatedly; to
reduce the time spent on the search for a solution;
to avoid re-obtaining an invalid solution. As
negative features that define the boundaries of
the precedent, the study indicates the following:
it is problematic to determine the criteria for
comparison; the method is applicable only in
regions where the principle of regularity is
employed and the types of problems are repeated;
insufficient level of generalization of the
precedent under the study.