Kresin (2022) outlines a number of changes that
Ukraine should initiate for building the security
system of the EU and the entire world. These
changes relate to the adoption of the UN
Convention that prohibits aggression against a
sovereign state, and establishes punishment for
this crime; creation of a security system based on
security guarantees and appropriate diplomatic
and military response to its violations; amending
the Charter of the International Court of Justice
of the United Nations; creation of a permanent
UN peacekeeping contingent to respond to
threats to the population and infrastructure;
inclusion of measures to counter non-military
threats, such as propaganda, terror, intimidation,
etc. in the security.
Melnyk (2021) notes in the context of the EU and
NATO membership requirements that Ukraine
cannot change instantly — changes require a
long time. This statement is true at the time of
writing the researcher’s work — 2021, however,
the situation has undergone certain changes with
the military invasion, as the results of this study
testify. The world got convinced of Ukraine’s
ability to resist the aggression of a much larger
country in terms of area and population, which
apparently had been planning an attack a long
time ago. In turn, Ukraine received significant
support for its confrontation efforts from the
countries of the world — financial, military,
humanitarian, etc. At the end of 2022, Ukraine is
waiting for a decision from the European
Commission on its compliance with the
recommendations regarding the Ukraine’s EU
candidate status. This fact alone indicates that
Europe is open to perceive Ukraine as a strong
and equal partner, so there are high chances that
Ukraine’s path to the EU and NATO membership
will be shorter.
However, some studies show that not all
European countries believe that Ukraine is ready
and is entitled to start the process of preparing for
EU accession. Van Elsuwege and Van der Loo
(28 March 2022) emphasize that Ukraine has
made significant progress in implementing the
Association Agreement, but the expected
catastrophic economic consequences caused by
the war may overturn these efforts and hamper
the implementation of the reform agenda. A
slightly different opinion was expressed in this
article: while agreeing with the authors on the
devastating consequences of the war, it should
be, however, noted that this view considers only
one side of the issue. First, all European countries
will feel and already feel the consequences of the
war. Second, it is necessary to take into account
that Ukraine continues to move along the chosen
course even in the most difficult times, and fulfils
the necessary requirements despite the obstacles.
Third, it is worth reminding that Ukraine is
currently a kind of “shield” for Europe in the face
of the aggressor. This struggle requires
cooperation of efforts, and Ukraine’s
approximation to the EU and NATO membership
could provide certain security guarantees to the
country, which is crucial for the security of the
EU as a whole, among other things.
This opinion may seem somewhat discrete in
contrast to the economic collapse caused by the
war, which is an objective reality. However,
some studies focus on the ideological side of the
issue. Bélanger (16 March 2022) notes that the
EU would probably not ignore the symbolism
behind supporting Ukraine – one of the last non-
EU countries – at times when it is attacked by an
aggressor. Otherwise it may affect the confidence
of other countries in the EU as a regional power
because of its uncertainty about expanding its
borders. Sapir (2022) notes that Ukraine had little
chance of obtaining the EU candidate status
before the invasion of the Russian Federation, let
alone becoming a EU member in the near future.
However, the heroic struggle of Ukrainians
against the aggressor gained the respect of all EU
countries, which became the reason for granting
Ukraine, as well as the neighbouring country
Moldova, the candidate status. The researcher
states two main obstacles on Ukraine’s way to
the EU membership: partially occupied
territories and the low quality of governance.
However, these obstacles should be ignored in
the event of Ukraine’s victory in the war, because
Ukraine will return its territories, and the quality
of governance, strengthened by the spirit of
victory, will be beyond question. If the victory is
not complete, the EU membership prospects will
be less favourable because of the constant
conflict with the aggressor.
Many researchers express concern about the state
of global food security in the context of the
reduction of exports from Ukraine, especially
grain crops described in the article. Some studies,
for example, the article by Ben Hassen and El
Bilali (2022), provide positive aspects in this
regard. The reduction of grain exports will
contribute to the intensification of agriculture in
other countries, as well as the development of
innovations in the field. Jagtap et al., (2022)
found that the biggest reduction in Ukrainian
grain exports will adversely affect Europe and
Africa. The researchers recommend that these
regions to consider alternative grain suppliers.
Some researchers even propose sanctions relief
packages for affected third countries in the