Similarities and differences among these
studies
The assessed studies have many similarities.
First, the studies are conducted in Arabic
countries such as Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and
Lebanon and discuss the topic of Artificial
Intelligence in the education sector (Mohammed
et al., 2021; Alhashmi et al., 2021; Sourani,
2019). Second, the main focus of the studies,
whether they explore artificial intelligence
usefulness, teacher and students’ perspectives, or
artificial intelligence development programs, is
to focus on the new challenges and gaps that exist
at different levels and could possibly affect the
future implementation of artificial intelligence in
education systems of Arabic countries (Yanes et
al., 2020; Alastal et al., 2021; Mira & Katie,
2019). Third, the studies explore artificial
intelligence as a new science offering a variety of
possible applications and impacts; thus, all the
studies provided an introduction and exploration
of artificial intelligence, how it works, and its
importance during the COVID-19 pandemic,
before proceeding with their main topic
(Abuzakiyeh, 2018; Alraasibia, 2021; Mahmoud,
2020). Fourth, all the articles involve teachers in
their sample, considering that teachers are the
most valuable resource of any educational
system, and the success of educating the
population heavily relies on them (Mohammed et
al., 2021; Nagro, 2021). Fifth, the articles agree
that Arabic countries’ infrastructure and
utilization of available resources still need lots of
work in order for artificial intelligence to be
properly and efficiently utilized within
educational systems (Hussin et al., 2021; Mira &
Katie, 2019).
The studies, though they discuss the main general
topic, reported many differences. First, the
studies were conducted in different countries,
including the KSA, UAE, Libya, Oman, and
Egypt. Second, the research papers explored
different subtopics, such as AI usefulness, AI
effectiveness during the COVID-19 pandemic,
AI training and program development, as well as
the views and awareness of teachers and students
on using AI in education. Third, the studies show
variation in the setting, the sample selected, and
the study variables. For example, the sample was
teachers in some studies (Al-Zyoud, 2020;
Elayyan, 2021), while others included both
teachers and students. In addition, the gender of
the study samples varied, as studies included
females, males, or a mix of both. Other studies,
such as Aldossary et al. (2020), explored the
difference in challenges between males and
females. In addition, the majority of articles
either used the control-experimental research
design (Abdeen, 2021; Abdel Baky, 2022;
Makhlouf, 2021) or the descriptive research
design (Aldossary et al., 2020; Fouda, 2020) to
achieve their goals. Other authors chose to write
a literary review (Alnaqbi, 2020), while some,
like El-hajj (2019) and Alhashmi, Mubin &
Baroud (2021), followed different qualitative
methodologies. Moreover, Sourani (2019) and
Haneya et al. (2021) used a systematic review
and a meta-analysis, respectively, to collect the
data from all the studies on artificial intelligence.
Other differences include the use of different
learning models and systems in the studies. The
Kolb model was adopted in the learning system
in Saudi Arabia (Abalkheel, 2022; Abdel Baky,
2022), while a machine-based recommender
system was adopted in the Yanes et al. (2020)
study. The majority of the other remaining
studies constructed their own questionnaire to
achieve their study objectives. In addition, the
studies explored the utilization of artificial
intelligence in different educational fields. For
example, Alnaqbi (2020) explored the utilization
of AI in military education. Fouda (2020)
explored 4G technology implementation in the
field of agricultural engineering, while Keezhatta
(2019) explored the relationship between AI
application and the linguistics field, specifically
Natural Language Processing (NLP) platforms.
Conclusions
This study presented how artificial intelligence
was used in education research from January
2018 to July 2022 to have a clearer view of AI in
the Arab world. This systematic literature review
explores selected papers that applied artificial
intelligence in the education sector in different
Arabic countries. The study also analyzed 29
selected studies according to the goal of the
studies, methodology, and results. Similarities
and differences were discussed among the
selected papers. Each of these topics was
explored in depth to have a clear view of AI in
education in Arabic countries. Four other
categories were also discussed: the countries of
the selected studies and field of the first author,
types of methodology, ranking journals that
published these studies, and types of institutions.
Many scholars reported that AI is considered a
new technology that is helpful in the learning
process. Therefore, it was applied in different
subjects, such as applied languages, medicine,
and science (Jabli & Alqahtani, 2022; Mahmoud,
2020; Makhlouf, 2021; Mawad, 2019; Mira &
Katie, 2019; Mohammed et al., 2021). AI was
also a good solution during the COVID-19
pandemic for supporting students in their