sexual violence has been a silent topic for a long
time. This is due in part to the fact that violence
against women was seen as an inevitable side
effect of war. However, in recent years there has
been a change in the perception of the nature of
sexual violence related to military conflict.
According to the provisions of the Rome Statute
of the International Criminal Court (Articles 6, 7,
8) (International Criminal Court, 2011;
Shablystyi et al., 2021), sexual violence related
to conflict both includes attributes and is an act
of genocide, a war crime and a crime against
humanity. In our opinion, such a legal assessment
of sexual violence indicates a high level of
danger as a socio-legal phenomenon, which has
negative multidimensional consequences as
regards the violation of fundamental rights
human rights and the and the nature and trends of
the development of the theatre of hostilities, as
well as, in general, the dynamics of the military
conflict itself.
To answer the question of how sexual violence
related to the conflict exacerbates the threat to
peace and security, we should recall that
according to the Academic Dictionary of the
Ukrainian language (Slovnyk.UA, 2022), peace
is the absence of disagreement, enmity, quarrels.
Peace is consent; lack of armed struggle between
two or more peoples, States. Security is a state
where no one is threatened. That is, in the case of
conflict-related sexual violence, peace a priori no
longer exists, as military conflict has developed,
and the state of security is replaced by the state
of extreme danger of becoming a victim of sexual
violence and other illegal acts. Conflict-based
sexual not only does it not promote peace, it
exacerbates and prolongs military conflict. As
sexual violence is a manifestation of aggression,
the desire to demonstrate power and dominance,
respectively, it affects not only women and girls,
but also men and people with other gender
identities as victims of conflict-related sexual
violence. According to Kharitonova (2022),
violence is used to violate social and legal norms,
to humiliate people and communities. Often such
sexual violence is a way for criminals to attract
political attention and thus declare themselves as
a dangerous armed group that should be
perceived seriously. During many wars, “sexual
conquest” of enemy women was considered both
a reward for military success and a trophy. Ruth
Seifert (1993) noted that one of the unwritten
rules of war is to allow the victors to sexually
assault women immediately after the battle. In
our opinion, such an “unwritten rule” about
receiving women’s bodies as a reward for
winning a battle is a manifestation of established
gender inequality and treatment of women as a
“secondary member of the society”,
permissibility of disregard for her rights, interests
and desires. For example, the published cases of
sexual abuse of women in Ukraine by the
Russian military fully confirm their worldview
and attitude towards women in a peaceful life. It
is known that the criminal legislation of Russia
Federation does not provide for liability for
domestic violence, although according to NGOs,
this phenomenon is very common and
widespread in Russia. This situation breeds
impunity and proves permissibility of such
actions, which ultimately leads to discord of the
moral face of a citizen of the Russian Federation.
The threat posed by conflict-related sexual
violence to peace and security is articulated
internationally. Thus, in 1992, the problem of
mass rape was taken into account by the UN
Security Council. Systematic violence against
women during armed conflict has been
recognized as an international crime.
In 1998, the International Criminal Tribunal for
Rwanda found the perpetrator of the rape for the
first time as having committed a crime against
humanity and a crime of genocide (The
Prosecutor v. Jean-Paul Akayesu, 1998). In 2001,
the International Criminal Tribunal for
Yugoslavia became the first international
tribunal to recognize rape as a crime against
humanity (Gaggioli, 2015).
It is these cases that have irreversibly changed
the landscape of international humanitarian law,
giving victims the opportunity to speak out about
the crimes they have witnessed and experienced.
It has been proven to the whole world that
everyone will be held accountable for atrocities
committed during armed conflicts. In 2002, the
Rome Statute (International Criminal Court,
2011) combined various forms of sexual violence
into one article and recognized them as a separate
category of crimes against humanity (Article 7):
rape, sexual slavery, forced prostitution, forced
pregnancy, forced sterilization and any other
forms of sexual violence of comparable severity.
A landmark event at the international level that
has clearly put key questions in one line was
adopted on October 31, 2000. The UN Security
Council Resolution 1325 (United Nations, 2000)
stressed that all parties to the armed conflict
should take special measures to protect women
and girls from gender-based violence, especially
rape and other forms of sexual violence in armed
conflict. Along with calls to protect women from
conflict-related sexual violence, the Resolution
1325 emphasized the special role of women in